I really can't see the point of a proliferation of mediocre test benches.
I'd much rather see the development of one outstanding one.
From my POV, it looks like the best hope of developing one outstanding one, is for people to contribute to pHaestus' efforts.
He already has a start. He has access to the resources of a university. He has the scientific analysis background needed to qualify his own test bench as accurate.
I don't see any benefit to dividing the 'available resources' between a lot of different test benches.
As for me contributing; I'm happy to contribute what I can to the development of a quality testbench as long as I am having fun. As soon as it starts looking like a big chore, I'll drop it. I'm not interested in a secret society of testers either.
And, WouldWhine STFU. You are contributing nothing but an angry buzzing noise. Your reaction to Bill, is nothing more than your reaction. The fact that Bill has a tendency to stir up hornet's nests, does not make a hornet's nest something other than a hornet's nest. Think about it.
|