Quote:
Originally posted by utabintarbo
Perhaps I have gapped, but has there been any determination as to how to do this? Are we talking about uniting behind pH's efforts or determining the outline of some generic "good enough" setup that the average block-hawker can duplicate? If it is the former, count me in.
Much as I hate to admit it, Bill is right on the mark here. Ignore the irrelevant.
Bob
|
Actually, I think that it's going to be somewhere in between, but closer to the first. Nothing has been defined yet.
The idea is to set the bar for a tester. If you look at what anyone has done in this area, there's various degrees of accuracy, in the different components.
So by setting a standard, we'd all know what to shoot for. Also, as I said earlier, I don't care what equipment one uses, as long as it can produce results that meet that "bar".
Joe, a big thank you for opening this Forum!
Bill: as I wrote earlier, the Forum is not going to be the central point of the Alliance: I'm just not going to allow that to happen. So if irrelevant posts come about, it really doesn't affect the effort of the Alliance.
BTW, I haven't heard from you, wether or not you'd like to be in on the e-mail list.
Utabintarbo: send me an e-mail address.
I also just had a chat this morning with Thykingdomcome who, with joemac, is getting ready to market a waterblock. I'm going to extend an invitation to both of them. That way, we'll have a manufacturer's input. Just trying to cover all the bases.