Quote:
Originally posted by unregistered
...
Ben
are you not listening ? (of course you are not, rhetorical question)
YOU do not have a SINGLE demonstrated quality to lead ANY technical inquiry
|
Ben does have one
absolutely essential quality for leadership: enthusiasm.
I view this situation as analagous to The Manhattan Project: General Leslie Groves was no physicist, he just let the physicists do the physics stuff. He took care of the admin details that allowed them to do their thing. If this is the role Ben wishes to undertake, those not interested in taking on that responsibility should be happy about it!
Quote:
Originally posted by unregistered
an answer to your invitation:
I have no interest in debating ANYTHING technical with you, as you have demonstrated with 6000 posts that you are incapable of grasping – and applying - the concepts behind the big words
sorry, but that is my assessment of your cabapility
in a public forum I will continue to assist those individuals who are serious,
such does probably not extend to mfgrs making competitive products
- should a serious Standards Group be formed (of the mfgrs, not at all what you are doing now), then I am sure Swiftech will be a major supporter and participant
|
I think we should model this after an open source software project. As I understand it, the main discussion thread takes place via mailing list, readable by all, often joinable by anyone interested. Forums are also useful, but not "cluttered" with administrative details (assignments of areas of responsibilty/research, etc.), but used for general discussions of purpose, features desired, etc. This way you seem to get the best of both worlds.
Bob