Quote:
Originally posted by gone_fishin
That's right, you don't know. You will never get any grasp of performance unless it is done at various flowrates. One point on a graph seems to be all you need. Without resolution and accuracy your one plotted point now becomes a big blob on the chart, get the picture? So my question to you is, why bother testing at all if you are going to do it that way? How could you tell a customer what is better if you don't have a way of knowing? Just tell them anything I guess and back it up with a half assed tinkertoy test setup?
Sorry to come off harsh but you seem to be trying to cater to the masses, people are already doing that without any testing at all.
|
Cater to the masses yes, as there is no point otherwise. :shrug: I sure the hell will not go through all this just to tell the 5 people I know that can do something with good results my results.
If I test 5 blocks, a, b, c, d, e, and on my system d performs the best on my die sim at whatever flow rate I am using then how is that not telling him what the better block is? All he has to do is try and match my flow rate. Even if we used multiple flow rates and made a chart they will STILL have to try and match a flow rate so why give them more options than they know what to do with?