Quote:
MichaelMuck:
email would have gotten you a quicker response
|
Yes, but would it have gotten me a more useful one? As of about 10 minutes ago, the only e-mail I had gotten from Mike was the automatic 'return reciept' telling me that the message was read:
Quote:
|
This is a receipt for the mail you sent to <removed by GR> at 9/14/2003 10:19 PM This receipt verifies that the message has been displayed on the recipient's computer at 9/15/2003 12:29 AM
|
Perhaps I wasn't explicit enough in my earlier message, when I said:
Quote:
|
Mike - I would like to arrange to return the tubing and get a refund of my $13.00, as I would NOT have purchased this tubing if I had known what formulation it was.
|
I don't know how I could have been more clear. However until I have an agreement that you will refund my money, I'm not going to return the tubing - right now I'm out money, but at least have some not very useable tubing. If I send it back without an agreement on the amount to be refunded I'm possibly out the money plus the additional shipping, and won't have the tubing either....
Is it necessary to leave you negative heat in order to make you do meaningful communication?
Gooserider
(A copy of this message will be sent to Michael via E-mail as well...)