Quote:
Originally posted by unregistered
vagueness ??
no, I would say you did not think through the scenario I posed
don't get your panties bunched
several of us here have been at this a long time, I simply do not recognize your 'handle' as a long term, ahem, contributor
perhaps Cathar will share his experiences with his late chiller project
Since87, see what happens when you give Les some slack ?
next he'll be pounding on me, lol
|
Hmm, ok. With some further thought, let me say:
You are simply saying that with the blocks you use, the limiting factor is heat "Extraction" at the chiller, and thus, you slow coolant flow to change this limit point great enough to offset the decreased efficiency of the waterblocks (both chiller blocks and cpu block).
Ok, i understand that.
Now, why must this be the only way? Why wont a high flow, high efficiency system work?
Oh yes: No, i am not a long time contributor, but i am a long time lurker. Just because i only registered a year ago and dont post much doesnt mean i am clueless/dont know history, etc.
Quote:
|
I find it amusing that Bill gets reported to the moderators for not giving up his company's trade secrets.
|
No, i reported this thread because of Les. At the time, it really pissed me off - and in retrospect, i agree with Joe, but i think that rudeness is uncalled for and should not be accepted in polite company - which this should be.