View Single Post
Unread 10-20-2003, 05:33 AM   #76
Les
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by KnightElite
Good work pH. 23ÂșC below ambient for CPU is not bad...

Is this CPU running at 2.0V with CPUburn at high priority?
The cpu is running at 1.6v and 2084MHz. ( As shown in his results http://www.procooling.com/users/phae...l/newtemps.jpg ) with CPUburn at high priority.
The graph of "Sub-ambient of cpu" v "Coolant Temp" probable reflects the change in Wattage as much as Coolant Temp

pHaestus.
The small dicrepncy between my version of the Billa data is due to my use of the raw data (as posted by Bill in http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/sho...5&pagenumber=5

Think C/W v Coolant Temp may show a real trend.
However feel that the use of Coolant temp as an indication of Wattage variation is optimistic.Feel the normalisation(terminology?) technique and then using VoltxVolt(cpu) values to obtain Watt variation maybe more appropiate:

Suggesting a Wattage range of 60%-100% for the 2200MHz cpu.
If ,and hopeful when, Flow-rates are available the use of all temps may give an insight into Wattage. Even the notorious bucket would be helpful.

Last edited by Les; 10-20-2003 at 05:41 AM.
Les is offline   Reply With Quote