View Single Post
Unread 11-04-2003, 11:27 PM   #32
Player0
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by winewood
please explain. the better performer isnt the lowest temp?
I'm not 100% which one is better yet. I havent posted all the performance variables. It will all be in the review. But basically, the RBX with the #4 jet is VERY restrictive. When I cut the flow back, both the Cascade and the RBX go to 38c.

If I was to use the #2 jet, Im sure that the flow would be pretty similar, and the Cascade would pull just slightly ahead. The temperatures are so close tho, its near the tolerance of error. There might not be a clear winner at this wattage level (about 95w).

At default XP2400+ speeds, the Cascade performs better, 32c versus 33c. Yes, its confusing, im working on it.
Player0 is offline   Reply With Quote