My point was:
a) Joemac says he trusts the independent testers (aka hardware reviewers) and not those with expensive equipment and technical training (due to bias).
b) An independent reviewer reports substantially different numbers than Joemac has spouted in forums.
And so what is at fault? The reviewer's numbers/methods? Joemac's statements? Are reviews to only be regarded as good independent testing when the results coincide with your company's marketing strategies? If so then I would just grant Ben exclusive review rights and be done with it.
Headed for bed now; leaving you all with some homework. Provide one example where a technically-educated scientist or engineer has purposely posted misleading data to the water cooling community to sell products. Feel free to look over my review history here at at
www.voidyourwarranty.net. Bill's testing is all mirrored at
www.thermal-management-testing.com . If you tire of that, then try for the consolation prize. Look for a mfgr who has posted half-true or misleading comments to sell their product. Now look at the original post and consider what to believe.
That's logic at work.