[jaydee]

Originally posted by Player0
Just more evidence to the stack that anyone can write articles for a website.

Yeah, I know, Im such a newbie water cooler. See? Look at the trouble I got in simply because DangerDen sends me a new block. Maybe I should just test the old ones from now on.

I been designing and building and testing blocks for over 3 years now and I am not qualified to properly test blocks dude. I can do it better than all but maybe 3-4 people on this forum and I choose not to simply because I cannot do it correctly. Where is your credintials?

Your results are considerably different than others and very suspect, your showing your bias just by jumping in on this thread and defending this block,

Um, okay? Who else has reviewed the RBX? What results are different than others? The only review Ive seen is on Modfathers, and it worked well for them too. Bill, I hope you test this block soon, I know you'll like it, they won't listen to me apparantly.

I was NOT refering about the RBX but the OTHER blocks you stated. You have the Maze 4 (interestlingly another DD block) outperforming blocks that have been proven to be much better than the Maze 4. Yeah that doesn't look like bias towards DD. (I have a Maze 4 BTW and have tested the hell out of it).

you don't know the D-Tek deal with Cathar? (the white water is selling well all over the world!), you still havn't given your testing bed specs or answered other questions, your testing results are rediculous, to much of the word "about" from someone who is supposed to be a tester, etc....

I posted information right on this thread. What, do you want me to cut and paste the review right here? I havent finished testing, and I'm trying to take in information here for consideration when I do release the review. Why do you think I am here, to enjoy the bashing? No, I want to see what the questions and concerns about the blocks are, and maybe I can address these in my testing.

BS! Then whats with the preliminary results to back up you new DD block? Why post them at all?

Your results will automatically be dismissed. if you want to keep credibility at least try and not look biased towards the stuff you review.

Im already dismissed with many readers at this point. I dont know how I'm biased. I tested the damn block and posted my numbers. I've always been labeled a SwiftTech bias because they always tested well for me. I guess I'm just biased about the blocks that perform best. Well gee.

Maybe you need to learn how to properly test before you claim to know WTF your talking about. You clearly do not. At least from your posts in this thread.

Will be interested to see the results of this block by ligitimate testers. Yeah I know, good luck there.....

I guess you think it's easy. Why don't you start writing. After all, I guess anyone can write reviews for a website these days. [/b]

If you followed me on this forum you would know the answer to that. I know all to well about properly testing. thats why I choose not to do it because I don't want to misinform people like you do! Your ignornace is very clear. I suggest you stop writting reviews immediatly before you continue to misinform your readers. Unless attention and hits to the site is more important to you.

Get some better testing equipment and learn how to use it. On top of that conduct yourself in more professional manner.