[jaydee]

I have wanted to write and post reviews on water blocks for a long time now. My intrest is more in the design of the blocks and how they work as opposed to just saying this works this good.

But over the last couple years I have tried to come up with an acceptable test bench to do this and always come to a dead end with people saying it isn't good enough. I have gained a lot of experience over the last couple years reading BillA's articles and studing his test bench and methods. Also have done extensive testing of my own blocks. I feel I can test blocks better than the majority of people already testing blocks with a few exeptions of course.

The problem I have is not understanding what is "sufficent experience" and what is "acceptable results". Over the last several months I have heard wildly different opinions even from the SAME sources.

So what I am asking for you YOUR opinion on what is an acceptable review to SHARE with the public. What should the review consist of, what measurments, and what kind of accuracy is minumal.

pH has me severly confused lately. He says not to slam the people that are learning for the benifit of knowlege and sharing your results, but then I see him consistantly bashing Ben who is trying to learn and share his experiences.....

I am pretty lost....