Well I feel I must clarify my statement.
DMOS: The issue of the test data is being addressed in PH's worklog Current review project (MCWCHILL). Nut I understand that no two testbeds are the same and as the log points out there are many variables and some havent been pinned down as of yet.
My point was and is, that as soon as anyone mentions the words "work better or as good as Bran X" the flames begin.
Most of us here know that test results are only as good as the test sytem and the acuracy in takeing these measurements.
What was originally posted was or at least what I percieved to be a Priliminary post and he came here to see if there was something else that needed to be aded to the review, Well in normal fashion, he was called a thief, liar and cheat and an idiot in short terms. That doesnt sound very helpful to me.
I am not defending anyone nor am I condeming anyone, just stateing that that seems to be the first response. 160 posts later we find that the block doesnt sit on an AMD Chip correctly and this is something that is bad and needs to be reported.
As with all reviews, anyone can write one, most anyone can post one and I am sure most if not all of us has been burned at least once by a bias review.
Hope this makes since.
Aardil
And Yes I am still waiting on my Casades.
|