The only one whining here is you. I'm just
the reader.
You could have set it as "news" with details about the product or a "work in progress" , with direct connection with Zalman. Nobody would have jumped on you like that (probably
).
Not as a nice add to zalman, refraining whatever else that you found out or really bad remarks. Presentation was the key here.
previewing an unfinished prototype -> waste of time.
where is the real thing ? It can be very different.
As far as i've seen, those are pictures from Zalman, same pictures from news sites, same camera , quality and colour work.
Did you actually seen the case, live ? Worked with it ? How about pictures YOU took ? And post those numbers you say you have. Even if to shut us up.
If you make assements based on non standard case (prototype)
or even pictures supplied from it , controlled information
then assumptions and "pros and cons" are based on thin air
how do we, the readers, should treat the article ? if all above is real
then you preview nothing. it's just an add with some remarks.
how do we NOT read it, if the written article is the issue, and not known to one that jumps in the thread ?
it's there , and is working both ways (pH hit the spot)
we have already read it, and these opinions are from reading it.
Take them as samples of your readers. learn from it.