Pro/Forums - View Single Post

pHaestus · 11-26-2003, 12:30 PM

My comments copied from the liquidninjas shitstorm thread:

And keep in mind JoeC tested with the LEAST restrictive of the inlet inserts!

I wish Joe would have tested out all of the nozzles and with the same pump in all cases. His 1.0GPM starting flow point is in a spot where most waterblock C/W curves are in their "knee" and so a small difference in final flow rate can have a fairly big impact on the C/W. If the RBX only moved say 0.6-0.7 GPM with with the 1048 then it might perform a lot worse.

11-26-2003, 12:30 PM	#3
pHaestus Big Player Making Big Money Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com Posts: 4,782	My comments copied from the liquidninjas shitstorm thread: And keep in mind JoeC tested with the LEAST restrictive of the inlet inserts! I wish Joe would have tested out all of the nozzles and with the same pump in all cases. His 1.0GPM starting flow point is in a spot where most waterblock C/W curves are in their "knee" and so a small difference in final flow rate can have a fairly big impact on the C/W. If the RBX only moved say 0.6-0.7 GPM with with the 1048 then it might perform a lot worse. __________________ Getting paid like a biker with the best crank... -MF DOOM