joemac
it is not at all personal, the basis of the recurring disagreement is intellectual
- it is your pernicious promotion of universal 'bias'
take your 'truth table' as a perfect example:
A = Engineers
B = Bias
C = Human
So
A + C = B
now there are many professions whose very functioning quite depends on their members being able to think and act in a unbiased manner
- yet you propose (and would like to assert as a truth) that if they are human they are also biased
that is a pretty ignorant statement, so what then is the logical conclusion ?
you have already stated what you will do wrt reviews:
take the good with the bad
i.e. figure you'll get as many erring positive as negative, and rely on the ignorance of the reader to be unable to distinguish between the two
- and of course your marketing by false and unsubstantiated innuendo as was shown on the Nordic site
-> so clearly you would apply that same standard to the reviews of your competitors
I know what you would do precisely because you have already said this; these are your words, not mine
(I must add that my boss, Gabe, is rather disturbed by my proactive role in this matter, but to me it is strictly an issue of intellectual honesty)
lets just accept that you, and sycophant winewood, claim all humans to be the whores of their paymaster
- while I assert that some can rise above that level
integrity is a nice word
you are welcome to the last word on this matter, let us hope it reflects better upon human capability than has been shown thus far
|