[Blackeagle]

Winewood,

You do NOT, have to have a bias or predudices to have a position based on research and testing you've done, nor to offer advice drawing from that same research and testing.

You have failed to show in any way how Bill has done other than to post information that he has ALWAYS supported with verifiable facts. Factual data, truth if you will, does not need anything in the way of distortion or bias of any kind, it stands on it's own.

Joemac,

I'm sure I'm not the only one waiting to see you post more than a opinion, unsupported by any FACTS. You just keep restating/rewording a negative series of innuendos in a shallow attempt to discredit Bill Adams.

You are welcome to think what you like, no arguement there, and enjoy all the theorys you wish as well.

But to post such, without supporting FACTS, is then slanderous. So if you can prove me wrong for defending Bill then produce your proofs, if not, then push on.

And you're right regarding a negative view of you, in my case at least, due solely to your unproven innuendos, posted both here and at other sites.

Frankly you increasingly disgust me.

Ben,

I would be very interested in reading those posts that Bill refered to. Could you please post them.
I would rather see this unpleasant thread continue a bit longer, with the hope of putting to rest this issure of repetative attacks on this and other boards aginst Bill by both Winewood, and Joemac.

Thanks Ben.