Pro/Forums - View Single Post

pHaestus · 11-29-2003, 04:22 PM

WW was out at time of JoeMac's comments and was specifically mentioned in that thread. Did he not know of that block either?

http://www.overclockers.com/articles876/

Bear with me here, but if the Aquajoe is slightly higher in its C/W vs head loss curve than the MC5002, then I would infer it would be a slightly worse performer than the WW at lowest (2lpm is not a typical wcer flow rate even with a 1048 pump btw) flow rates, and much worse when you get to typical low flow scenarios.

Who other than Bill produces C/W vs. Pressure drop graphs?

While you are pulling up definitions, please try obfuscation. To be clear, that is what I am accusing you of doing.

11-29-2003, 04:22 PM	#60
pHaestus Big Player Making Big Money Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com Posts: 4,782	WW was out at time of JoeMac's comments and was specifically mentioned in that thread. Did he not know of that block either? http://www.overclockers.com/articles876/ Bear with me here, but if the Aquajoe is slightly higher in its C/W vs head loss curve than the MC5002, then I would infer it would be a slightly worse performer than the WW at lowest (2lpm is not a typical wcer flow rate even with a 1048 pump btw) flow rates, and much worse when you get to typical low flow scenarios. Who other than Bill produces C/W vs. Pressure drop graphs? While you are pulling up definitions, please try obfuscation. To be clear, that is what I am accusing you of doing. __________________ Getting paid like a biker with the best crank... -MF DOOM