Quote:
Originally posted by joemac
Blackeagle define Little.
|
O.K. Drawing from the graf.
Aquagold @1.5 mH2O shows a C/W of approx. .21
C/W of .21 multiplied by a 90 watt output from a pretty high O/Ced CPU. So, .21 X 90 = 18.9c
MCW5002 @ 1.5 mH2O shows a C/W of approx .209
.209 X 90 = 18.81c
To me, that is a "little" differance of .1c.
Now let's try that again. I did some digging at OverClockers and found the WW test, and it's C/w @ 1.5 mH2O. C/W of .18
.18 X 90 = 16.2c
So now we see that the differance in heat rise allowed by the Aquagold is 2.7c higher than that of the WW. A pretty
LARGE differance!
Glad you asked, helped me to better understand why Bill called you on saying the WW is only a "little" better than your blocks. And also why it's P.O.ed you so bad to have it pointed out to people that you'd hope to lead into beleiving that the differance wasn't worth considering.
And with the price cut at D-Tek you no longer have a price point advantage. So if people take the time to consider the performance of each block, they'll be buying a WW, unless they run a TEC. And if they run a TEC, they may opt for the Swifty as it's a better known company, who's products have been repeatedly tested & shown to perform well. And with the higher heat loads a TEC operates at, every "little" bit helps.
Have a nice day! !
