Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Blackeagle · 12-01-2003, 07:12 PM

Bill a valid point of course.

But as Joemac only wishes to use posted results of others, I used the best data I could find.

Still not wise, those are HIS methods, and those numbers are no doubt off.

And perhaps it will help him to gain a grasp of what a "little'' differance is, and isn't.

Suppose he was on B. Clinton's team during the Monica sex scandle?

Nah, he's not good enough.

EDIT:

Bill, I was tempted to use JoeC's C/W numbers for the MCW5002 block, which was a C/W of .15, but then what would I have had for a description of "little"?

12-01-2003, 07:12 PM	#110
Blackeagle Thermophile Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: U.S.A = Michigan Posts: 1,243	Bill a valid point of course. But as Joemac only wishes to use posted results of others, I used the best data I could find. Still not wise, those are HIS methods, and those numbers are no doubt off. And perhaps it will help him to gain a grasp of what a "little'' differance is, and isn't. Suppose he was on B. Clinton's team during the Monica sex scandle? Nah, he's not good enough. EDIT: Bill, I was tempted to use JoeC's C/W numbers for the MCW5002 block, which was a C/W of .15, but then what would I have had for a description of "little"? Last edited by Blackeagle; 12-01-2003 at 07:25 PM.