Pro/Forums - View Single Post

Blackeagle · 12-01-2003, 08:09 PM

Joemac,

Would you have rathered I use JoeC's numbers for the MCW5002?

I wouldn't have had a set of numbers then as a example of "little".

But would have had one for VERY Large, instead.

JoeC's numbers for your block = .21

JoeC's numbers for the MCW5002 = .15

Those numbers would then give a temp differance of 6.4c! !

Now 6.4c is a huge differance, but both sets of numbers come from JoeC. Most of all when the numbers I DID use shrank that HUGE differance down to .1c which is within the testing error of even Bills equipment.

Seems to me, those numbers would really trash your blocks performance. I used the more conservative numbers to be fair. So you can bitch, but it rings hollow.

12-01-2003, 08:09 PM	#112
Blackeagle Thermophile Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: U.S.A = Michigan Posts: 1,243	Joemac, Would you have rathered I use JoeC's numbers for the MCW5002? I wouldn't have had a set of numbers then as a example of "little". But would have had one for VERY Large, instead. JoeC's numbers for your block = .21 JoeC's numbers for the MCW5002 = .15 Those numbers would then give a temp differance of 6.4c! ! Now 6.4c is a huge differance, but both sets of numbers come from JoeC. Most of all when the numbers I DID use shrank that HUGE differance down to .1c which is within the testing error of even Bills equipment. Seems to me, those numbers would really trash your blocks performance. I used the more conservative numbers to be fair. So you can bitch, but it rings hollow.