Quote:
Originally posted by jaydee116
A little off topic, but this is where I have issues with JoeC's tests. The AquaJoe should have been tested ALONE without that kit deal.
I find it hard to belive the Maze 4 bitch slaps the AquaJoe block at .18 C/W. http://www.overclockers.com/articles889/
Errrr, then again where are you getting .21 C/W for the Aqua joe block? All I can find is the kit test at .19C/W? http://www.overclockers.com/articles850/
|
Jaydee, you're right, I jumbled my test numbers with the testers. The .21 is from Bill's posted graf earlier in this thread. But the point remains that JoeC's numbers show a greater spread in performance than do Bill's, yet Bill is supposed to be biased? Don't think so.
And I very much agree with you Jaydee, JoeC should have tested the block alone, and on his ususal testing bed. Then we'd have some numbers that could be compared with some hope of honest results from the comparison made.
But then, I think, that's the point Bill has been making all along.
The FACT is that there are no really dependable numbers on this Aquagold block anywhere. Just smoke and mirrors with no factual numbers whatsoever to support his (Joemac's) marketting BS. And calling it marketing BS is kind, after looking at his claims at NH.
The more I see, the more I hope that pH runs a series of tests on the Aquagold block vs WW, Cascade, MCW5002, Slitedge, RBX...........
But also hope he gets it, as he (pH) said, from a retail outlet.