Pro/Forums - View Single Post - PolarFlo -- CPU SF Block and the VGA/CS Block

AngryAlpaca · 01-19-2004, 08:45 PM

I usually support parallel, but in your case I'll make an exception. The NB block is probably less restrictive than the GPU block, and, as such, you'll be getting more water through the NB than the GPU, and that makes no sense. The one degree difference between the PolarFLO and the WW at idle and load could easily be an error, as gruntville so helpfully points out. They were also using an unlapped WW, and that would seriously affect performance, but that won't matter if you don't intend to lap.

01-19-2004, 08:45 PM	#5
AngryAlpaca Cooling Savant Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Alberta Posts: 631	I usually support parallel, but in your case I'll make an exception. The NB block is probably less restrictive than the GPU block, and, as such, you'll be getting more water through the NB than the GPU, and that makes no sense. The one degree difference between the PolarFLO and the WW at idle and load could easily be an error, as gruntville so helpfully points out. They were also using an unlapped WW, and that would seriously affect performance, but that won't matter if you don't intend to lap.