MCW60-T™ Liquid Cooled Thermoelectric Assembly for Graphics Processors

Ls7corvete · 05-17-2006, 05:47 PM

http://www.swiftnets.com/products/mcw60-T.asp#

Linear C/W graph for a TEC eh?

I would love to see how this really performs when I get around to testing TECS. 123$ is a bit rough though.

ricecrispi · 05-17-2006, 07:46 PM

$45 for WB
$45 for pelt at retail price
$15 for coldplate
$5-8 fpr ceramique
$10 for neoprene foam to make own gasket
@ $120-123

Seems priced about right for retail, expecially if you built a unit buying everything at retail. To bad they don't have the unit without the pelt around $60-80. Might call swiftech to find out.

I doubt the data is completly linear so they must be approximations but shouldn't matter that much. The curves shouldn't vary much if load increases but coolant temps was held at constant 35C. That doesn't apply to a real running looping though so is some what deceiving. Plus running at pelt at higher voltages produced smaller improvements.

05-17-2006, 05:47 PM	#1
Ls7corvete Cooling Savant Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: FL Posts: 164	MCW60-T™ Liquid Cooled Thermoelectric Assembly for Graphics Processors http://www.swiftnets.com/products/mcw60-T.asp# Linear C/W graph for a TEC eh? I would love to see how this really performs when I get around to testing TECS. 123$ is a bit rough though.

05-17-2006, 07:46 PM	#2
ricecrispi Cooling Savant Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: california Posts: 429	Re: MCW60-T™ Liquid Cooled Thermoelectric Assembly for Graphics Processors $45 for WB $45 for pelt at retail price $15 for coldplate $5-8 fpr ceramique $10 for neoprene foam to make own gasket @ $120-123 Seems priced about right for retail, expecially if you built a unit buying everything at retail. To bad they don't have the unit without the pelt around $60-80. Might call swiftech to find out. I doubt the data is completly linear so they must be approximations but shouldn't matter that much. The curves shouldn't vary much if load increases but coolant temps was held at constant 35C. That doesn't apply to a real running looping though so is some what deceiving. Plus running at pelt at higher voltages produced smaller improvements.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)