 | ||
|
||
|
|||||||
| Testing and Benchmarking Discuss, design, and debate ways to evaluate the performace of he goods out there. |
 |
| Thread Tools |
03-20-2005, 01:53 PM
|
#1 |
|
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 158
|
TIM Testing
The current high end of TIM testing .... Hadn't come across this B4 (from 2003) hopefully not a repost, Looks DAMN Expensive.
|
|
|
|
03-20-2005, 02:32 PM
|
#2 |
|
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 219
|
coolness...................
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2005, 04:30 PM
|
#3 |
|
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
JEDEC = max tech + $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
for us anyway |
|
|
|
|
03-20-2005, 04:50 PM
|
#4 |
|
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 158
|
Would be nice for them to provide some numbers for common TIM materials to the common users.....To bad it ain' gonna happen.
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2005, 05:08 PM
|
#5 |
|
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
huh ?
Inchoerent just did so |
|
|
|
|
03-20-2005, 08:00 PM
|
#6 |
|
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
The only result I want to see is how much loss the TIM causes in transferring the heat. I believe I read Incoherent's results but not sure a answer was there? Might have missed the last part of the discussion though.
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2005, 08:57 PM
|
#7 |
|
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
I glanced at it real quick, catching the highlights, and couldn't help but wonder if it would be possible to characterize a TIM based on the rate of temperature range. There are many allusions to this, including a reference to the heat capacity of the TIM material...
Must read some more. I don't see how a dry joint can be used as any kind of reference point. I'd also like to see the cleaning method (that is, if they don't replace the blocks each time!). |
|
|
|
|
03-21-2005, 03:25 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 158
|
Quote:
No dis' intended for Incoherent, his work and atention to detail are far beond what most of us could hope to acheive, but mounting pressure / block alignment in a spring type setup could lead to inacuracies... i.e. If samples are taken for a series of mounts, and the mount is never absolutely perfect, the results will be scewed and a lower c/w will result. I couldn't venture a guess as to how much accuracy is gained from the $$,$$$ investment involved in building such a rig, but it would be nice to see. |
|
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.