![]() | ||
|
|
General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums. |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 13
|
![]()
as far as specs go for pumps, PQ is about as good as it gets but it's difficult to determine the flow rate of a system with only that information since all of the pressure drop is happening at the water blocks. i was hoping to see some way of determining how much pressure drop to expect from a specific block along with the dTvsQ graph in the block reviews. the purpose of this measurement is to help with deciding on a pump to get for a specific system.
the way i'm understanding is, that at extremely low flow rates (eg. 0.5GPH) there is no pressure drop since it's hard to really restrict such a flow rate. however there comes a specific flow rate at which pressure drop begins. this could be labeled as restriction point (i'm not sure what the technical term would be), the amount of flow necesarry to produce significant restriction. also, in addition, it would be nice to have dPvsQ graph for each block to give an idea of how much restriciton to expect from a setup. this way you can just look at the pressure drop as a static number, which would make it much easier to choose a pump for a system. ie: Storm G4 = ~3PSI and 1GPH restriction point DDMazeGPU ~2.3PSI and 0.7GPH restriction point tubing ~1PSI and negligible restriction point so you need at least 6.3PSI of head pressure to produce a somewhat effective loop. this is just a suggestion from my incredibly elementary understanding of pressure and flow, where (as i've read... as long as i haven't misread) the total drop in pressure is the sum of all of the restrictions in the loop. it may not be that simple but this gives a rough idea to people who need to know which pump to get for a specific setup given "x" "y" and "z" blocks in the loop. is something like this possible? or even feesible? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA - Boston area
Posts: 798
|
![]() Last edited by bobkoure; 08-26-2005 at 08:08 AM. Reason: added a link for Google impaired |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 13
|
![]()
no... that doesn't look like it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]()
I think he wants to know the pressure drop of the water blocks. Something pH is doing and something I am working on doing. This info should start showing up sooner or later. Also Robotech has already posted some data on it. Problem is there is no way we are gong to cover every block on the planet.
But yeah, if you know how much presure drop there is for each part and a general idea of what the pump can do you should be able to put together a decent system. This has been a project in the works around here for ever now. Just not easy to do because of so many combinations of components. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 13
|
![]() Quote:
yea covering every block there is would be no small task but covering the main blocks would be nice, like the Swiftech, DangerDen and Cathar parts and maybe a few other popular designs like some NexXxos blocks or something. it would make it MUCH easier to determine necessary head pressure. also, i realize that this data is only somewhat useful, because certain blocks (like the G4 and TDX) require powerful pumps to get the most out of the block, which is why the dTvsQ graphs exist. but by providing the pressure drop with the review you can get a general idea of how much flow is NECESSARY (although not optimal) for running a certain loop. this type of measurement would be ideal for people looking for a silent system, rather than high performance, as they would be able to pick a low power pump based on the pressure drop of each component in the loop. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]()
What bothers me is manufactures should provide this information. It shouldn't be left up to us to figure it out. We should be here to verify the information not create it in the first place.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Skokie, Illinois
Posts: 322
|
![]()
Mfgr's specs for restriction of blocks (rads and res's too) would be great.
went through the following machinations to approximate the flows I would get by replacing an Eheim with an Iwaki. The only info I "knew" was the flow rate of my current system..the rest is easy if you have pump curves (which are available for most). Flow resistance for some blocks (and some rads) is available as stated above, but it takes alotta digging. And doesn't account for your specific tubing (size/type), barbs, and routing. Nor does it account for the barrametric pressure, phase of the moon or currency rates at the time of the testing...sorry, can't get \\WING// out of my head! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
|
![]() Quote:
Not sure I follow your machinations or the flow rate you are predicting. My method:- Eheim1048; flow rate 2.2 lpm indicates 1.335 m(H2O) System PD (Yellow data point) Construct "System P/Q curve" assuming P=Constant*Q^2 which gives the "dotted black line" with an intersection of the "Iwaki P/Q curve" at 4.79 lpm. The predicted Flow Rate is ~ 4.8 lpm ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA - Boston area
Posts: 798
|
![]() Quote:
So the question becomes, given already-chaotic flow (so no "hockey stick" shape to the graph) what does the flow/restriction curve look like? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|