![]() | ||
|
|
General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums. |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 3
|
![]()
A forum member is posting that a loop will reach equilibrium within a few minutes and that temps will be equal through out loop. This is saying that temp at radiator inlet and outlet would be the same. As I am a Mech.Eng. I have studied some thermodynamics when in school. And as I remember the Laws this has to be incorrect. This member is saying that this is being said on this forum. I am always willing to learn if any member can inform me or is this poster not know what he's talking about. Thanks for any help.
Last edited by lowboy; 12-21-2005 at 09:04 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
![]()
It's partly true.
The difference does exist, but it's very small, and can be hard to measure. The roughest measurements will not conclusively show a difference. Here's an article by my colleague Martin, which includes the formulae (on page 2) for estimating that difference: http://www.nordichardware.com/Articl...lse=347&page=1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 400
|
![]()
WC systems do indeed obey the first law. What you have to consider is that the enthalpy changes in the system due to heat addition and removal are small when compared with the overall temperature variation from ambient. I.e. water maybe on average 10c above ambient due to the thermal resistance of the system and may only expel 1c of heat in the rad. As such as an engineer you could say that heat change in the system is small and that it runs at an equilibrium temp.
Punching a bit of math and you should be easily able to prove this to yourself, with the c/w and power input numbers available around here. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: France
Posts: 1,221
|
![]()
this is also due to the high specific heat (kinda thermal capacity) of water. A 1°C of temp difference in water represents a lot of energy. That's why the temp across the system is considered 'uniform' (the temp difference is considered unsignificant)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
CoolingWorks Tech Guy Formerly "Unregistered"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
|
![]()
no (stop Ben)
time to equilibrium in the system, assuming a 'stiff' environmental chamber, depends on the flow rates; - at 0.3 gpm with a 'low' fan ~1.5 hrs are required if the temp resolution is 0.01°C - at 3 gpm with a screamer 10 min is sufficient a temperature difference in the thermal world is not called equal, and if the difference represents the work being done it certainly IS significant (what are all these really small numbers abut eh ?) EDIT lb many things are posted here, many wrong and 'let slide' by others I commented only after 3 others failed to identify the time constant of the system as the object, and made a hash of the temps Last edited by BillA; 12-22-2005 at 08:17 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Pro/Life Support System
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,041
|
![]()
I was just about to reply but then I see bill and gmat said what was going to say (more or less)
__________________
Joe - I only take this hat off for one thing... ProCooling archive curator and dusty skeleton. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 3
|
![]()
I understand the assumptions being made in the models. The terminology being used raised questions for me though. Thanks for the replys and it may be not be PC today but I wish everyone a Merry Christmas!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|