![]() | ||
|
|
Network/IP Tech Talk about that lil Penguin, or that lil Devil, or even those broken Windows! ;) All things networking. |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 385
|
![]()
Just downloaded the beta of Windows Vista, and am in the process of getting a seperate box up to run it. Anyone else out there play with it yet? Just thought I would get a little discussion going...
__________________
Snap Server 4100, 4x120GB Seagate Drives, RAID 5, version 3.4.803 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 909
|
![]()
Played with prior releases to the Public one....
__________________
Snap Server Help Wiki - http://wiki.procooling.com/index.php/Snap_Server Snap Server 2200 v3.4.807 2x 250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 w/ UNIDFC601512M Replacement Fan "Did you really think it would be that easy??" Other NAS's 1x NSLU2 w/ 512mb Corsair Flash Voyager Running Unslung 6.8b 1x NSLU2 w/ 8Gb LaCie Carte Orange Running Debian/NSLU2 Stable 4.0r0 250GB LaCie Ethernet Disk Running Windows XP Embedded |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: May 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 14
|
![]()
I've been messing with it on a couple of boxes here. So far, it's performing as advertised. No major issues to speak of...it hasn't even BSOD'd on me once yet.
The Nvidia Vista drivers are junk though....they've hobbled all the advanced/hardware features. (and now the fan runs at 100% all the time) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 385
|
![]()
Is it as resource hungy as MS is making it out to be? The minimum specs are pretty crazy for an OS...
__________________
Snap Server 4100, 4x120GB Seagate Drives, RAID 5, version 3.4.803 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: May 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 14
|
![]()
On the current test rig it's using about 700mb of ram. That's full eye-candy on, sidebar, aero, every pretty-but-useless option turned all the way up. Dropping it down to "Windows Classic" and killing all the extras only saves you about 50mb of ram load. It's advertised memory management imporovements do seem to be working...it does seems to get out of the way pretty smoothly when loading up a ram intensive app. And oddly, losing the eye-candy actually makes it "feel" slower on this machine. Haven't benchmarked anything to see if that's really true or not. This is a pretty middle of the road system: Celly D 2.66, only a gig of ram, and a 6600gt.
Disk-space wise the default Windows install fills about 7 gigs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|