Go Back   Pro/Forums > ProCooling Technical Discussions > General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat

General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums.

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 01-13-2002, 01:58 PM   #1
richone
Cooling Neophyte
 
richone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 33
Why Is Pump->Rad->Block Better?

Before I strip down my watercooling rig to try to tweak out a few more degrees, I need to understand why
Pump->Rad->Block->Pump
is better.

I have a submerged pump in a resevoir that currently is setup Pump->Block->Rad->Pump. The system is 47C Cpu(idle, 51C load), 30C Radiator, 27C Ambient. The block is clamped down super tight and AS2 was used. Would changing to Pump->Rad->Block help?

Thx
__________________
---------------------------
Yes, Yes I Am Watercooled.
Live Temps
richone is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-13-2002, 02:12 PM   #2
derraa
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: RI (no, we are not part of NY)
Posts: 95
Default

The submerged pump generates heat. If you have the pump before the radiator, that heat gets dispersed into the air without efecting your processor temp.
derraa is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-13-2002, 02:52 PM   #3
futRtrubL
Cooling Savant
 
futRtrubL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Posts: 204
Default

If you want increased performance then accepted practice is using an inline pump before the rad. This way the pump adds less heat to the water and the gets rid of it before it reaches the CPU. I have my reservations about this as the heat output of the pump is negligible compared to the CPU exept when idle, when it doesn't matter.
If you want decreased chance of failure and increased longevity then the accepted practice is to use a submerged pump after the rad. This way the pump has less chance of overheating itself and the water is cooler in it. However, pumps that are sold as inline and submerged are sold that way because they are reliable in those positions, and water temp shouldn't get too high anyway.

To make a long story short it's really down to preferance. ;']

Edward
futRtrubL is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-13-2002, 03:58 PM   #4
Brad
Thermophile
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Nuu Zeeelin
Posts: 3,175
Default

I doubt it really matters, most of the pumps product so little heat. It is a little bit better, but not by much
Brad is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2002, 01:33 AM   #5
Pinkster
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: adelaide, australia
Posts: 61
Default

when i changed from pump (inline eheim 1048) from after the rad to b4 the rad my temps actually increased by 2 or 3 degrees C at the same ambient temp. i think its because in this setup it was physically less conveinient the way my components are setup in the case so my pipes were heading all over the place and i had to use more pipe and a 90 degree bend to put pump b4 rad. i think this slowed down waterflow enough to more than cancel out the benifit of the rad cooling the heat produced by the pump. so i say just do it in whatever order is most convenient for the way your components are setup in the case. my experience was with an inline pump though, might be a little different with a submerged pump.
__________________
whats a sig?
Pinkster is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2002, 10:03 AM   #6
WebMasta33
Cooling Savant
 
WebMasta33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 526
Default

What radiator and fans do you have on it? From what it sounds like, is that your radiator isn't getting enough heat out of your water. This is what I get, but I'm not sure.:shrug:
__________________
==========
--Soyo KT333 DRAGON Ultra (Platinum Edition)
--AMD 1.4 @ 1.54 (11x)
--768mb of PC2100 (@140FSB)
--Asus v8200 GeForce3 @ 210/490
--Maxtor 40gb Quiet + 2 IBM 40gb 60GXPs (removable) + 8gb WD
--Audigy
--Maze 3, DD Gf3 block, 2x BIX, Eheim1250
===========
WebMasta33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2002, 10:45 AM   #7
Joe
The Pro/Life Support System
 
Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,041
Default

There may be a minimal effect, but logic shows that you want the heat exchange point that is cooling the coolant as close to the object you are trying to cool as possible.

I have followed that logic in every system I have built, since why would you want to introduce a heat source BEFORE the cpu?
__________________
Joe - I only take this hat off for one thing...

ProCooling archive curator and dusty skeleton.
Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2002, 01:23 PM   #8
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Joe
There may be a minimal effect, but logic shows that you want the heat exchange point that is cooling the coolant as close to the object you are trying to cool as possible.

I have followed that logic in every system I have built, since why would you want to introduce a heat source BEFORE the cpu?
What he said. The coolest water in the system is the output of the radiator. Therfor you want the output to go directly to the block for the coolest temps.
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...