![]() | ||
|
|
Xtreme Cooling LN2, Dry Ice, Peltiers, etc... All the usual suspects |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 83
|
![]() ![]() Could you plz giver some commnts on the design? It is merely a rough schets but enough to giv you a general idea. My goal is to built a pelt into an waterblock, so i have direct cooling, which is more efficient. The whole inside area presses on the pelt, so normally i shouldn't have any problems with low pelt pressure or so if i use a coldplate of 3-4mm or am i wrong with that? Greetz ZaVkE
__________________
signatures are for wussies |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: By the computer
Posts: 51
|
![]()
I think it would be better to split the tube like and do this. but you can do something like ]this or the following
![]()
__________________
AMD Athlon XP 1900+ Water Cooled Soyo SY-K7V Dragon plus! 512 DDR radoen 9500 Soft Mod Give Me Money Last edited by Hixup; 06-20-2002 at 08:51 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Nuu Zeeelin
Posts: 3,175
|
![]()
that won't work terribly well, just get rid of the channels and have an open block design
__________________
2x P3 1100's at 1400, Abit VP6, 2x Corsair 256mb PC150 sticks, 20gb 'cuda ATA-III, 2x 40gb 'cuda ATA-IV in raid 0. 20" Trinitron. No fans 2x 2400+ at 2288mhz (16.0 x 143), Iwill MPX2, 2x Kingmax PC-3200 256mb sticks, 4x 20gb 60gxp in Raid 5 on a Promise SX6000. Asus Ti4200 320/630. Cooled by Water |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 83
|
![]()
I can't get rid f all the channels because i need something to press the pelt against the bottom, otherwise i have a large descent in performance of the pelt.
My design was done because of the high flow rate of it, so the hot water will be out of there quicker. Maybe an approach with a larger channel, but still my desing would be better?
__________________
signatures are for wussies |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 151
|
![]()
Nice idea. I feel that you should have the chanel walls a little lower so when you put the pelt in and then the base would just cover up the whole inside. But take note of the allowance for the wires and seal the wire connections very well so that no water can get to it. Try to make the chanelwalls as thin as possible so that you can have more surface of pelt to water while still applying pressure on the pelt.
But again, there's a problem to this. Soldering the base which is the coldplate to the shell, which is the hotside, there will be quite a signifcant thermal leak from cold side to hotside. Epoxy maybe better, but then again, how insulative can a thin layer of epoxy be? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SLO, CA
Posts: 837
|
![]()
One problem I have encountered with epoxy; it doesnt like thermal stress. Sure it works for a while (meaning anywhere from 2 - 60 days) but eventually the epoxy will crack, warp, or just loose its bonding properties. I have had it happen to me 3 times with my old res. Used epoxy to seal the inside and outside of a bottle but after a while of running my water throught it (the temps going up and down) the epoxy gave way and leaks happened.
I could be wrong in this situation however I should point out that there is a risk.
__________________
Athlon64 X2 4200+ @ 2.5Ghz (250FSB x 10) OCZ VX 1GB 4000 @ 250FSB (6-2-2-2 timmings) DFI LANParty nForce4 Ultra-D SCSI Raid 5 x (3) Cheetah 15K HDDs LSI Express 500 (128MB cache) OCZ PowerStream 520W PSU ATI X850XT PE (Stock) DTEK WhiteWater + DTEK Custom Radiator Eheim 1250 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
![]()
Epoxy won't be the best solution, any Pelt requires heavy clamping to work at its best, and this can only be done, ironically, with metal screws.
'tis best to clamp, then isolate. That WB design (1st one) is best for cooling a core, as it receives cold coolant in the middle, in line with the CPU core. The channel design is best for Pelts, because the heat is spread out more evenly. You must work around the channels, by making a fat corner for the clamps to the cold plate. Where there's a will, there's a way. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 151
|
![]()
I think you'll have to sacrifice some clamping pressure if you want to direct water cool the pelt. I think the reason why pelts work so much better with high clamping pressure is because the many many little metal things inside that transfers the heat across dont have such good thermal contact with the ceramic plates to begin with. And with so many of them spread across the whole pelt, applying pressure just at the perimeter would not have as good an effect as applying pressure throughout.
That said, you have some rather spreaded out pressure with that chanel design so it shouldn't be too bad. Perhaps like they said, epoxy isn't such a good idea, but some form of insulative barrier should be implemented. Perhaps you should have the shell with the same height throughout so that when the coldplate comes on, it isn't in contact with the shell. Then you can use screws to tighten. As for preventing water from leaking out, maybe silicone or plumber's goop. Actually what I'm describing is much similar to Tom Leuken's block except with your chanel design + forgoing the rubber gasket, and a cold plate clamped on. All IMHO. Last edited by Miss_Man; 06-21-2002 at 12:28 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 83
|
![]()
Maybe i can just make the top block a bit bigger and the coldplate also. That way i can drill 4 or 8 holes in the edges of each and use screws to clamp them together (with or without isolating material between the block and the coldplate, the idea is the same) and then use the 4 outside holes to hld it on the MB.
How about that idea?
__________________
signatures are for wussies |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 151
|
![]()
Yes, that was what I was talking about, just make sure you have spreaded clamping pressure over the peltier.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 83
|
![]()
And what is i drop the channeldesign and go for a open design but supported with round vertical bars (eg the alpha pal aircoolingsinks, but far not as many) or will the channeldesign work better?
It just because i want to restrict the flow as less as possible because i heard that that can really be a problem with a channeldesign.
__________________
signatures are for wussies |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 151
|
![]()
Thats a nice idea too, but bear in mind the more copper in contact with the pelt, the less direct watercooling you're doing. I would opt for pins spaced evenly and spaciously apart, since the main thing here is directly cooling the pelt with water.
With them spaced generously apart, there shouldn't really be much flow rate problem. And try to make the chanel depth shallow. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 83
|
![]()
my idea exactly
__________________
signatures are for wussies |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
![]()
For those still in doubt about clamping, read this:
http://www.procooling.com/articles/h...just_how.shtml |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|