![]() | ||
|
|
General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums. |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: D-FW, Texas
Posts: 26
|
![]()
Hey guys Brandon here..
I was just sitting here at my desk pondering something. How much modification would a single display CompuNurse and a 1/2 inch (14MM) Tee need to accurate get temps inside the loop? -Brandon |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 96
|
![]()
Hey there.
I used that same temp probe and just taped it to an exposed brass barb. Its temperature will be the same as the water temp and you won't affect the flow rate at all. Hope that helps. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Thermophile
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,064
|
![]()
Depends what you mean by "accurate"...
__________________
Once upon a time, in a land far far away... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: D-FW, Texas
Posts: 26
|
![]()
"LOL" just a rough ballpark idea. I dont need anything scientific here. Just always wanted to know. If I could get within 5-10 degrees I'd be satisfied.
-B |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 96
|
![]()
You'd be within 3'C (IMO) if you taped the probe to a barb, and that includes the 'accuracy' of the compunurse.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: D-FW, Texas
Posts: 26
|
![]()
Sweetness thanks man... Enjoy your evening....
B! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,064
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Once upon a time, in a land far far away... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 96
|
![]()
Guesstimation.
Although the given accuracy of the compunurse is +- 1'C and I can't see why a brass barb would be more than 1'C cooler than the water constantly flowing through it. Do you really see it being out by more than that? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 310
|
![]()
the barb would be a few C cooler than the water i would think. the metal of the barb would disipate the heat faster than the water would so it would cool off. Feeling the brass barb on my rad right know I can confirm that it is noticably cooler than the water in the loop is..
Its best if you can get the probe to actually touch the water... but even then, the accuracty of the nurse is not.. well its just not accurate. A while back pH did some tests with the thermal probes compared to a calibrated high end measuring unit, and the temps varied from relatively accurate to 3-5C (if i recal correctly) off the mark... imo, i would call accurate within 1C of the actual temperature.. that being accurate only for the cheap probes that we purchase for computer related stuff.. the real probes are accurate within .1c...
__________________
Excuse me, I believe you have my stapler. Last edited by MaxxxRacer; 01-26-2005 at 09:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 221
|
![]() Quote:
metal "feels" cooler than an insulating plastic like your hoses, even if both are at the same (below body) temperature. This is because of the much higher thermal conductivity of brass/metals in general. What is the temperature gradient througha brass barb? If the inside of the bard is at water temp, i highly doubt the outside is a couple degree cooler. That implies that brass is a quite shitty heat conductor. since brass has a thermal conductivity of 111 watts per meter per degree kelvin, lets look at a situation where the brass is a few degrees cooler on one side of the barb. Lets assume that your cooling loop is dissipating 222Watts of heat through this brass barb alone (which is more than your entire cooling system disipates, but hey!), and the outside of the barb is 2 degrees cooler than the inside. so, your brass barb is a meter thick? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 310
|
![]()
lol.. a few is 3 or more up to around 7max... thats what i think of as a few.. and im talking about C... 3C is alot and 7C is alot more for that matter. but thats a different story altogether..
anyway you got the point. btw, bill just stated in another thread that the brass gives you messed up temps because it IS cooler... he just encountered the problem.. the brass feels cooler because it is... "Metals are the best conductors. That is why we use them for making such things as saucepans and radiators. It also explains why metals usually feel cool to the touch. If a metal object is at a lower temperature than your body, it will quickly carry heat away from your skin when you touch it. The opposite is true if the metal is warmer then you are. Then the metal will quickly give up its heat to your skin so that it feels hot to the touch." I grabbed that from a lab procedure off of google.. Anyway.. We can adapt that example to the barb situation.. imagine the warmer metal beign the barb and your finger being the water going through the barb... the barb is warmer than the barb, so the barb dumps its heat into the water, thus making it cool.. water doesnt have good heat conductivity (compared to metal), so it will take in the warmth from the barb.. Thus the barb is cooled (just like your copper waterblock on your cpu) and it IS cool to the touch... And some more food for though.. the barb on the exit side of the rad should be slightly cooler than the one brining water into the rad.... try it.. i dont think it will be noticeable without a calibrated temp measruing device (oh pH where are you), but the difference will be there...
__________________
Excuse me, I believe you have my stapler. Last edited by MaxxxRacer; 01-26-2005 at 09:56 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Thermophile
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,064
|
![]()
I'd be more concerned about airflow over the barb causing your probe temps to fluctuate. At least if the probe is inside the barb it's not being air cooled.
__________________
Once upon a time, in a land far far away... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Posts: 96
|
![]()
If you've got a t-piece and the probe is ok in water (the thin ones are in my experience) then feet it in on the t untill its almostin the flow and seal up with goop.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Thermophile
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,064
|
![]()
Not sure what sort of sensor the compunurse uses, but I'd be cautious about sumerging anything that wasn't properly sealed up in water. I've nuked a few thermistors from water immersion (they work fine for a while, but after a few months they just disintegrate).
__________________
Once upon a time, in a land far far away... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 221
|
![]() Quote:
If the temperature is off, it is because of air flow past the probe, not because the outside of the barb is 3-7 (LOL, this makes the barb multiple meters thick) degrees cooler than the water. Oh and for your edification - 1 degree change kelvin is the same as one degree change C. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 310
|
![]()
i know one degree kelvin is one degree C.. known that for many many years....
and actually the quote supports exactly what I was saying... you say that the metal just feels cooler, not that it is cooler.. you think this because the metal will conduct the heat from our bodies much faster (pulling the heat away from us), which is true to an extent, but if you put a thermal probe on that piece of brass even with no airflow over it (just the water in it) it will show that its cooler than the water inside. you can test it even with one of the laser temp sensors where there will be no change in temp from airflow over the sensor.. or you can take a thermistor and cover it in goop and neoprene so there is no airflow over it at all. what your saying about the thermal conductivity properties of brass I am not arguing. "since brass has a thermal conductivity of 111 watts per meter per degree kelvin" I am not arguing that.. but... when you apply water to the equation, the brass does not have to be thick at all to be cooled. in that example where it is several meteres thick you are saying that if you apply a heat source to one side of it and for the temp to be differet on the other side it has to be N meters thick.. well that example DOES NOT apply in this situation.. The barb is being cooled all around.. the barb will be as cool as it is on the outside as it is on the inside. so if you strap the sensor to the inside of the brass barb with the water, it will still give you low temps because of the lower temperature of the brass. So you see, the barb is not jsut cool on the outside, its cool on EVERY side... I hope this makes sense to you now... Butcher: Im pretty sure the compunurse uses a thermistor.. Pretty much all the inexpensive temp gaugues use them.
__________________
Excuse me, I believe you have my stapler. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Madison
Posts: 99
|
![]()
Take a brass hose mender of the correct diameter and a couple of Omega's precision RTD's http://www.omega.com/ppt/pptsc.asp?r...0KN&Nav=temc13 . Drill holes to fit to insert the RTDs into the hose mender in the middle and then insert the RTDs with Artic epoxy. After letting everything setup, solder wires to the RTD and then strain relieve the wires by potting with RTV in a 3/4" tubing sleeve as a form. After all is done you can calibrate your sensors to .1 or better using an ice bath and boiling water and then insert into any line in your system to get a pretty good reading at that point
__________________
"Diamond is cool stuff....." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK Lancashire
Posts: 25
|
![]()
Maxx,
perhaps there's a different way of thinking about it? If you were outside and the air temp was at 1 deg C, and you had a bucket of water at 1 deg C too, which would feel the coldest to have your hand in? Obviously the cold water would conduct heat away from your hand much faster than the air, reducing the temp of your hand much faster. With the brass T in your loop the water would conduct heat to the brass fitting pretty quickly, wheras the brass T would dissipate heat to the air much more slowly. Its the principle on which a radiator works. Lots of fins on the air side to give a large surface area for heat transfer, smooth passage for the water as it conducts heat to the radiator very efficiently. In reality the temp of the brass fitting would have to be somewhere between the water temp and the internal case temp, but due to the above it would be very close to the water temp. If brass Ts were so good at removing heat from the loop we'd have radiators made out of them. Hope this makes sense. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 310
|
![]()
I see what you are saying and I know that. but as you stated yourself the brass barb will be cooler... thats what my point was in the first place. Im not saying it will be a HUGE difference, but the barb will make the results rather useless... actually having the sensor touching the water would make it a heck of alot more accurate.
__________________
Excuse me, I believe you have my stapler. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK Lancashire
Posts: 25
|
![]()
Yes that sounds right too, though I don't think it would make much difference as the conductivity of brass (~109W/m.K??) is much higher than that of the TIM (~5W/m.K??) you normally use to mount sensors . It would be interesting to actually make one to find out. Depends on what order of accuracy you were after I guess. From what I've read around here the accuracy of the sensors would be the major stumbling block. I suppose at least it would give you a relative temp should you change a pump or block, so that you know whether your temps had improved or not.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 310
|
![]()
yah, but having it on the outside of the fitting, it would insulate it even more and minor temp fluxuations would take longer to be read, that is if they were read at all..
True that the biggest stubling block is the sensor itself, but there is no sense and not giving it the best enviornment you can to get accurate temps..
__________________
Excuse me, I believe you have my stapler. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vallentuna, Sweden
Posts: 410
|
![]()
If the brass fitting and temp sensor are properly insulated there will be no temperature difference across the barb wall.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: U.S.A = Michigan
Posts: 1,243
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|