![]() | ||
|
|
General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums. |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#41 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 66
|
![]()
Hi!
I like your block, could you please post a detailed drawing so that a complete rookie like myself could make one? Or is it classified? =) Thanks! Jon |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
![]()
Some interesting developments on my front with the micro-channel block.
So I've cut out a small plastic disc and inserted it under the central inlet barb. Out of that disc I've cut a 5mm wide x 15mm long rectangle that straddles the channels, giving a reasonably small entrance for each channel to receive water. This effectively boosts the water velocity and creates impingement jet streams directly over the heat source. I also picked up a Pondmaster 4200 pump today too, which pushes 1000lph at 4m head, and close to 4000lph in wide-open mode. Okay, now we get to the interesting bits of comparing nozzled and non-nozzled performance with the Eheim 1250 vs the Pondmaster 4200. An AthlonXP CPU was set to 1925MHz/2.15v using BurnK7 to generate full load. The following CPU die temperatures were observed above the water temperatures (reading the on-die diode of the CPU). Eheim 1250 - No nozzle - 8.0lpm: +18.5C Eheim 1250 - Nozzled - 7.0lpm: +18.0C (really it's more like +18.25C - temps kept flipping) Pondmaster - No nozzle - ~15lpm: +18.0C Pondmaster - Nozzled - 12.0lpm: +17.0C What's interesting here is that the nozzled block improves in performance as the flow rates are picked up more than the un-nozzled block. The Eheim 1250 seems to be struggling to get enough flow to make the jet impingement principle work properly, but the pondmaster's extra pressure ensures that the water velocity through the nozzle is boosted enough to get real benefits of jet impingement. What's uncertain here is where there's more to be gained in terms of the nozzled vs non-nozzled configuration as the flow rates are picked up even more, or if the full benefits of the jet impingement is being realised already. I believe this is on the right track, by mixing the two proven cooling methodologies of micro-channels and jet impingement, coupled with a pump capable of the water pressure and flow rates to make it all come together as a functioning whole. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
![]()
Great! Now try both pumps in series!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
![]()
Come to think of it... I'm having a hard time picturing what you did. Do you have a pic, or diagram?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
![]() Quote:
So rather than the entire ID of the lower barb opening onto the all the channels, just the small rectangle opening is made available for the water to squeeze through. (Edit: Note - the second picture does not have the nozzle disk in place - I just put it there so you can better picture how the block gets put together and where the nozzle covers) ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
![]()
Interesting. That's what I thought it was.
I would still like to see a side-to-side test, with the center barb plugged, not just capped. As I mentionned, I believe that the water was jumping the channels, at a critical point, because the center barb was left capped. Additionally, you could try a cap that would come down into the channels, for a higher velocity at the critical point. Nice work. What do you have in mind next? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
c00ling p00n
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 758
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:* E6700 @ 3.65Ghz / P5W DH Deluxe / 2GB 667 TeamGroup / 1900XTX PC Power & Cooling Turbo 510 Deluxe Mountain Mods U2-UFO Cube Storm G5 --> MP-01 --> PA 120.3 --> 2x DDC Ultras in Series --> Custom Clear Res "Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity." 1,223,460+ Ghz Folding@Home aNonForums *:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:* |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 | ||
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
![]() Quote:
So how does it perform? CPU @ 1925MHz/2.15v, K7Burn as usual. Pondmaster - 11lpm - CPU @ +18.5C above water temperature. So you can see that it is worse, which is also what I expected. You see when the water jets down atop the CPU core area, all of the water volume is hitting that region. When in side to side mode, despite how turbulent the water may be, not all of it is going to be down at the hottest region (it physically can't), so the copper has to do more work and carry the heat up the walls to be cooled, giving that difference that is seen. (At least that's my working theory). Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 62
|
![]() Quote:
BIOS version 1011, 1012 and 1013 have fixed this temperature problem. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
![]() Quote:
I'm using 1011 right now, which I reverted back to from 1013 when I had stability issues there with my other hardware in my system (a common problem reported with the 1013 BIOS over at AMDMB). For both the 1011 and 1013 BIOSes I see the same temperature issue. In fact, I have to be using a 1011 BIOS or newer since the on-die diode reporting is not supported in BIOSes prior to 1011. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
c00ling p00n
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: L.A.
Posts: 758
|
![]()
Cathar, have you tested performance with one of the outlets closed? I'd be very interested to see how it would perform going in the center, and out only ONE barb. Sorry if this has been asked/tested already.
__________________
*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:* E6700 @ 3.65Ghz / P5W DH Deluxe / 2GB 667 TeamGroup / 1900XTX PC Power & Cooling Turbo 510 Deluxe Mountain Mods U2-UFO Cube Storm G5 --> MP-01 --> PA 120.3 --> 2x DDC Ultras in Series --> Custom Clear Res "Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity." 1,223,460+ Ghz Folding@Home aNonForums *:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:* |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atacama desert, Chile
Posts: 43
|
![]() Quote:
What about using a dremel? I had the idea of similars blocks and my thought was to build them using a dremel or a dremel-like tool and a reinforced cutting disk having the dremel in a fixed stand and a guide to move the blokc inside a thight fitting slot and advance the whole thing sideways a fixed amount (channel + fin thickness) each time you completed a slot. I just measured the thickness of reinforced disks cuts and it is 1mm and a 5mm deep slot should not be so difficult. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: classified
Posts: 534
|
![]()
Damn Cathar, that pump is expen$ive!! It is similar to an Iwaki though, something I hope to get soon...
__________________
...i hurt... do me a favor, disconect me... they can re-work me but i'll never be top of the line again ...i'd rather be nothing... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
![]() Quote:
Not quite that expensive. Expensive if you walk into an aquarium and try to buy one retail, yeah. Not expensive if you go to a cut-price outlet store. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: classified
Posts: 534
|
![]()
True...good to see it helped though.
__________________
...i hurt... do me a favor, disconect me... they can re-work me but i'll never be top of the line again ...i'd rather be nothing... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 204
|
![]()
Hey Cathar, ever thought of trying a dual output rad. I made this rad today. Got to finish the shrouds, but will be done by the end of the week.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 204
|
![]()
.
Last edited by DodgeViper; 10-10-2002 at 07:52 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: on da case
Posts: 933
|
![]()
i feel like a total amateur looking at all the heavy equipment u guys r using. my shrouds are mostly comprised of cardboard and ducttape. works though, but i'm not gonna win any beauty contests with em.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 468
|
![]()
Damn I just love that rad, is that one also from Chevrolette Chavette? I found one from Opel Corsa it's very similar, the only thing is it's 19cm wide, and that 1cm to much to fit it in most cases. What are dimensions of that rad?
__________________
[My ftp, with lots of pics, hope to be home page someday ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
![]()
No, never used a dual-outlet radiator.
What are you using it for? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|