View Single Post
Unread 02-27-2007, 04:35 PM   #4
blue68f100
Thermophile
 
blue68f100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 3,135
Default Re: General SnapOS FAQ Speed Test

Below is test data showing the speed of various models.

This data was contributed by:
(1). Phoenix32, 4000 & 4100 (uses NetStat for speed)
(2). JELo , 1000, 1100, 2000, 2200
(3). Blue68F100 , 1000, 1100, 2000, 2200, 4100 (w/ WD2500SE RE drives)

These number are considered best case, your values may differ. With that said, FTP will be significantly faster than smb. And not all ftp programs are the same. I have seen as much as 50% difference in speeds between client software. FileZilla gives me the best speed. Where I have both data showing the difference it is posted.

Model ...... FTP (w/r) ................ SMB (w/r) All values in MB/sec

1000 (2) 1.5/1.5 (ViceVersaPro)
1100 (2) 3.8/4.6 (ViceVersaPro)

2000
Raid1 (2) 2.7/4.7 (ViceVersaPro)

2200 (2 x 300gig, Seagates)
Raid0
Raid1 (3) 5.7/8.8 (FileZilla) ................. 3.6/8.0
Raid1 (2) 4.3/5.6 (ViceVersaPro)


4000 (4 x 30gig)
BOD
Raid0 (1) 6-6.7/10.5-12 ................... 4.9/5.9
Raid1 (1) 6-6.7/10.5-12 ................... 4.5/6.3
Raid5 (1) 4.3/10.5 ........................... 4.5/5.9

4100 (4 x WD2500SB RE Drives) v4.0.860
JBOD (3) 6.2/9.6
Raid0 (3) 5.1/9.3
Raid1 (3) 5.7/10.1
Raid5 (3) 4.6/10.0............................. 3.5/5.2 (netstat 3.7/5.5)


I will update these tables as I get it, I have 1000, 1100, 2000v1 logged just need to dig it up.
__________________
1 Snap 4500 - 1.0T (4 x 250gig WD2500SB RE), Raid5,
1 Snap 4500 - 1.6T (4 x 400gig Seagates), Raid5,
1 Snap 4200 - 4.0T (4 x 2gig Seagates), Raid5, Using SATA converts from Andy

Link to SnapOS FAQ's http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=13820

Last edited by blue68f100; 04-10-2007 at 07:12 PM.
blue68f100 is offline