![]() | ||
|
|
Water Block Design / Construction Building your own block? Need info on designing one? Heres where to do it |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#26 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: rsm,ca
Posts: 87
|
![]()
wow!
is that for real? from dangerden? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK - Bristol
Posts: 134
|
![]()
when did they release that?
where did you get that picture from? Last edited by GTA; 05-30-2003 at 04:54 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Just shut up ;) ...
Posts: 1,068
|
![]()
I was going to sugest putting a slit across the middle in my last post but thought the centre 'circle' was too small to warrant it...
I was'nt being derogatory with the WW killer comment, I really do like this block, very inovative and think it'll perform well (better than Maze3 and probly better than the 4, yours is better detailed). It's a shame about DD's timing though, is'nt that always the way though? :shrug: ... I'd be interested in a block with 12mm inner diametre barbs made from some copper pipe, are the ones on there threaded or epoxied into the polytop?... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK - Bristol
Posts: 134
|
![]()
I'm properly pi$$ed about that block from DD, basically, it seems to me like they've copied my idea, implemented it very poorly, and are going to flog it off as their own work.
You can see in some of the diagrams I posted early in the thread that my block originally did have a groove through the middle, but I found that it wasn't actually needed in the end. @MadDogMe, the barbs are just balanced on there in the pic, in the test block, they will be soldered onto a fourth plate, in the real thing, i'll be using 3/8BSP barbs, with a 10mm internal bore, screwed into the top plate. By the way, does it look to you guys like DD have stolen my idea? or do you think its just a conincidence that we've both come up with the same design independantly? On a side note, they havn't got enough grooves, the grooves they have got are too far apart, and the barbs are too far apart as well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 7
|
![]() Quote:
yep, i'm the same bloke, thought i'd use the same name here so people know who i am (same name on OcAU too ![]() unfortunately i wont have time to test it at the mo cos i've got university exams going on next month, but if you still want it tested in about a months time, i'd be happy to (though i'd expect you would have tested it yourself by then, and maybe have made some more. i'm sure i'd be interested in getting hold of one of the final blocks ![]() one other thing i thought of, are you going to put holes in the top for athlon-64 mountings as well, or does that complicate things? just thought it'd add some future-proofing to the design |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 7
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]()
No, they didn't steal the design. They have been working on it for a lot longer than this thread has existed. The one in the picture is months old and just a prototype. The retail version I hear is modified quiet a bit from that.
Last edited by jaydee116; 05-30-2003 at 01:31 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK - Bristol
Posts: 134
|
![]()
Either way, I havn't been more angry than this in a long time.
I can't believe that I put so much effort into this design, and its just been ripped by DD. Depresssing is not the word for it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Responsible for 2%
of all the posts here. Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas, U.S.A.
Posts: 8,302
|
![]()
FWIW...
I think that this Maze4 is a natural progression on the Maze3: I wouldn't beat myself up over it. We've been waiting for something new from DD for a very long time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 7
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK - Bristol
Posts: 134
|
![]()
Well, no-ones gonna buy my block when DD have one almost exactly the same are they
![]() Nah, you're probably right, they didn't steal it, but its the worst possible thing that could have happened, a company, probably the most respected in the whole watercooling world, has a block almost identical to mine, and there's nothing I can do to compete. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 7
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 381
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Michael E. Robbins M.A.Sc. Candidate, University of Toronto 12.1 GHz of AMD's finest (17.7 GHz total) crunching proudly for the AMDMB.com Killer Frogs SETI BOINC: Dual Opteron 246s (Iwill DK8N) | XP2800+ (Shuttle SN41G2) | 3x XP2400+ (ASUS A7N266-vm) SETI BOINC: 2x P4 2.8E (ASUS P4R800-vm) | Crunching 24/7 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 381
|
![]()
I don't think it's fair to say they're the most respected water vendor just because all the noobs buy there. I do know what you mean though... whenever a "what's the most l337 block?" thread pops up at Overclockers the Maze 3 always gets high praise... sometimes it even comes "within a degree or two" of the White Water.
![]()
__________________
Michael E. Robbins M.A.Sc. Candidate, University of Toronto 12.1 GHz of AMD's finest (17.7 GHz total) crunching proudly for the AMDMB.com Killer Frogs SETI BOINC: Dual Opteron 246s (Iwill DK8N) | XP2800+ (Shuttle SN41G2) | 3x XP2400+ (ASUS A7N266-vm) SETI BOINC: 2x P4 2.8E (ASUS P4R800-vm) | Crunching 24/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]()
Here is the production version.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Just shut up ;) ...
Posts: 1,068
|
![]()
They've used a mill to make that block (and the NB/GPU block) so you could cut the cost(and time?) by using a lathe could'nt you...
Don't give up on your block, they are'nt the same really, just simular. Performance is based on surface area, baseplate thickness, ect. Not looks... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK - Bristol
Posts: 134
|
![]()
Comparing their block to mine...
1. They have 4 grooves, I have 6/7 if you include the middle hole 2. Their grooves are wider than mine 3. Their block is oval, not circular 4. Their grooves look VERY shallow, which is very odd, I worked out a depth of 5mm would probably be best in this sort of design. 5. It looks like the base on the block is fairly thick, I still think they could shoot for something like 1.5-2mm, I'm going for 0.8-1.2 on mine. 7. Their grooves don't continue to under the inlet and outlet... thats quite interesting. I don't know if thats a good or bad thing, I'll thinkabout it. Well, if their Maze4 beats their Maze3, then mine should beat both quite handily, and hopefully not cost an awfull lot more to make, there might be life left in my design yet. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK - Bristol
Posts: 134
|
![]()
And I say respected not on the ground that n00bs buy them, or that they're particularly high performance, but that they have a very good reputation for reliabilty, and there are very few things to fault in their blocks. They make cheap, decent performance blocks, and as a company, they seem freindly and customer orientated.
For example, they did have a slight issue with the clear tops on the Maze3 when they first came out. They fixed the problem, but also replaced many blocks, free of charge, that had had problems. To me, thats the mark of a respectable company. I know what you mean though, there are many ways to measure respectability, but to me, they do very good work. ( I'm less pissed off now, after some sleep, was a long week at work ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Just shut up ;) ...
Posts: 1,068
|
![]()
It's purely numbers with DD IMO. SO MANY people brought them because it was them or Swiftech (I did), availability plays a big part as well. They are 'respected by numbers' not by performance
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK - Bristol
Posts: 134
|
![]()
Well, I've tested it, and results were impressive, beating a Maze3 by 3-4 degrees.
Of course, and as I'm sure someone will leap in a point out, my testing cannot be relied upon, too many discrepancies etc. etc. ![]() Either way, its looking good, and I'm going to find some way to get it tested properly after I make a few modifiactions. The only problem is, its a HARSH flow killer, in its current form at least. The middle plate, with the slits, either needs to be eliminated, or modified. I know that flow isn't that important in some cases, and as Cathar rightly points out, worrying about flow restriction may be holding back waterblock design. However, I use my watercooling on all the other hot parts in my system, and I need to save SOME flow for the other 4 blocks I use, so I'm going to sort it out somehow. In either case, I feel that the basic concept of the block has been proved, and proved to work well, but it needs refining slightly in order to make it possible to sell, and more suitable for the average user. I'll keep you posted, but for now, its back to the drawing board. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]()
What if you just made a slit where the barbs are except in the base itself instead of the middle plate. Would drop costs a bit if it worked.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 221
|
![]()
the slit exists for one reason (on your design):
To spread the flow of water to all the channels as evenly as possible. Its not there for impingment, is it? Because if it is, its not over the core. I'd like to see how it works with NO middle plate at all. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|