Pro/Forums - View Single Post

blue68f100 · 02-19-2008, 12:05 PM

CentOs, Tells me they did not want support. The Snap HW is very specific. This thread is where a user loaded FreeBSD on a 4500, had flags that needed changing inorder for it to work with the ServerWorks Chip. The same may apply with the 4200. http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/sho...highlight=4500

I was suggesting use the direct video and KB vs going through the com port.

My guess at this point is that you may need to reset the BIOS back to defaults, then change/verify the boot order. Thinking that it is trying to use the SCSI as a boot device.

02-19-2008, 12:05 PM	#5
blue68f100 Thermophile Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Plano, TX Posts: 3,135	Re: 4200 No post CentOs, Tells me they did not want support. The Snap HW is very specific. This thread is where a user loaded FreeBSD on a 4500, had flags that needed changing inorder for it to work with the ServerWorks Chip. The same may apply with the 4200. http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/sho...highlight=4500 I was suggesting use the direct video and KB vs going through the com port. My guess at this point is that you may need to reset the BIOS back to defaults, then change/verify the boot order. Thinking that it is trying to use the SCSI as a boot device. __________________ 1 Snap 4500 - 1.0T (4 x 250gig WD2500SB RE), Raid5, 1 Snap 4500 - 1.6T (4 x 400gig Seagates), Raid5, 1 Snap 4200 - 4.0T (4 x 2gig Seagates), Raid5, Using SATA converts from Andy Link to SnapOS FAQ's http://forums.procooling.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=13820