Question for Nexxo

djskinnyb · 01-14-2005, 11:28 AM

Since my search for Nexxo and Fluorinert only came up with 2 threads...I wondered what your overall experience has been running Fluorinert in your system? (for those of us interested)

nexxo · 01-14-2005, 02:09 PM

I've not had much experience with it yet-- just the Athlon MPs before the mobo konked out during BIOS re-flashing.

However in that time I found it worked very well. The processors stayed chilled and there was absolutely no residue in the tubes or discolouration of the blocks. The pump had no trouble with it either. It has a very low surface tension so it makes good contact with the blocks and rad.

Some guy on Wizard Designs Forums has been using it for a while on his dual Xeon system and he, too, swears by it, finding it very efficient at cooling without having to worry about corrosion or algae growth.

Since it is roughly the same price as FluidXP, I think it is worth the expense --especially as a potential leak won't fry your expensive hardware. When it spills, it evaporates harmessly leaving no redisue whatsoever so you wouldn't even need to clean your components.

PS: just a thought... next time just PM me.

djskinnyb · 01-17-2005, 07:33 PM

I mostly asked here so it would be picked up the search for anyone else who wanted to know.

Thanks for the heads up. The algae growth/corrosion concerns combined with the leak insurance make the price seem a little more tolerable.

killernoodle · 01-17-2005, 07:43 PM

If you are using flourinert, why not just do immersion cooling?

nexxo · 01-21-2005, 02:49 PM

Because it's impractical. Try to fit a watertight case around a moterhboard and still access its rear ports!

Etacovda · 01-21-2005, 03:56 PM

That, and it would require many more litres, which to most would be bank breaking.

redleader · 01-21-2005, 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by killernoodle

If you are using flourinert, why not just do immersion cooling?

Immersion cooling is silly and impractical. You get better performance with conventional watercooling at a fraction of the effort.

Nickd · 01-21-2005, 06:02 PM

Even with immersion cooling you'd still need to find some way of transferring the thermal energy into the air around your case to dissipate it wouldn't you? Thus you'd still need some form of rad and fans etc..

01-14-2005, 11:28 AM	#1
djskinnyb Cooling Neophyte Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Iowa Posts: 13	Question for Nexxo Since my search for Nexxo and Fluorinert only came up with 2 threads...I wondered what your overall experience has been running Fluorinert in your system? (for those of us interested)

01-14-2005, 02:09 PM	#2
nexxo Cooling Savant Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Brimingham, UK Posts: 385	I've not had much experience with it yet-- just the Athlon MPs before the mobo konked out during BIOS re-flashing. However in that time I found it worked very well. The processors stayed chilled and there was absolutely no residue in the tubes or discolouration of the blocks. The pump had no trouble with it either. It has a very low surface tension so it makes good contact with the blocks and rad. Some guy on Wizard Designs Forums has been using it for a while on his dual Xeon system and he, too, swears by it, finding it very efficient at cooling without having to worry about corrosion or algae growth. Since it is roughly the same price as FluidXP, I think it is worth the expense --especially as a potential leak won't fry your expensive hardware. When it spills, it evaporates harmessly leaving no redisue whatsoever so you wouldn't even need to clean your components. PS: just a thought... next time just PM me. __________________ "There is a thin line between magic and madness" Last edited by nexxo; 01-16-2005 at 12:57 PM.

01-17-2005, 07:43 PM	#4
killernoodle Thermophile Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Charlotte, NC Posts: 1,014	If you are using flourinert, why not just do immersion cooling? __________________ I have a nice computer.

01-21-2005, 02:49 PM	#5
nexxo Cooling Savant Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Brimingham, UK Posts: 385	Because it's impractical. Try to fit a watertight case around a moterhboard and still access its rear ports! __________________ "There is a thin line between magic and madness"

01-21-2005, 03:56 PM	#6
Etacovda Cooling Savant Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Dunedin NZ Posts: 735	That, and it would require many more litres, which to most would be bank breaking. __________________ Hypocritical Signature I tried to delete: Procooling: where scientific principles are ignored because big corporations are immune to mistakes and oversights.

01-17-2005, 07:33 PM	#3
djskinnyb Cooling Neophyte Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Iowa Posts: 13	I mostly asked here so it would be picked up the search for anyone else who wanted to know. Thanks for the heads up. The algae growth/corrosion concerns combined with the leak insurance make the price seem a little more tolerable.

01-21-2005, 06:02 PM	#8
Nickd Cooling Neophyte Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: UK Lancashire Posts: 25	Even with immersion cooling you'd still need to find some way of transferring the thermal energy into the air around your case to dissipate it wouldn't you? Thus you'd still need some form of rad and fans etc..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)