Go Back   Pro/Forums > ProCooling Technical Discussions > General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat

General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums.

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 08-03-2004, 07:51 PM   #1
Anemone
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston MA area
Posts: 48
Default Fan CFM ? in push/pull design

Ok budding aerospace engineers (it sounds good no?)

In a push pull design do the CFM passed equal the adding of the CFM of both fans, or is there some rough % of each fan that is applicable to arrive at the total CFM that passes through the rad?

Thanks again!

Anemone is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-03-2004, 08:08 PM   #2
greenman100
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 414
Default

LOL

I take it you assume the fin thickness/density has no effect, as you didn't give this info

you certainly do not add the free-flow CFM ratings together

think <80% of free flow rating of one fan

probably WAY less
__________________
"Employ your time in improving yourself by other men's writings, so that you shall gain easily what others have labored hard for."
--Socrates
"greenman100 = obnoxious ass hole"-gazorp
greenman100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-03-2004, 08:11 PM   #3
Zogthetroll
Cooling Savant
 
Zogthetroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio, U.S.A.
Posts: 177
Default

well, this is a topic that has been thouroghly hashed out a number of times, so there's plenty of material on it around here. If memory serves, (and don't take this as fact, please do some searching to confirm it) the number I remember was that a push/pull config with similar fans netted about a 40% increase over a single fan (pulling).

ha, dang, beat me to it.
__________________
My Machine (wip)
XP1800, 256Mb Ram, DVD, 52x CD-R, 40Gb HD, GeForce4 MX 420

Clear Cube
XP2000, 256Mb Ram, 32x CDR, 40Gb HD
Zogthetroll is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-03-2004, 08:15 PM   #4
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

data ?
I have tested such and NEVER seen anything like that

DATA guys, keep it real
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-03-2004, 08:17 PM   #5
pHaestus
Big Player
Making Big Money
 
pHaestus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com
Posts: 4,782
Default

http://phaestus.procooling.com/shrouds-BIX.GIF

nor I

TOO MUCH NOISE for too little cooling gain
__________________
Getting paid like a biker with the best crank...
-MF DOOM
pHaestus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-03-2004, 09:27 PM   #6
Mars
Cooling Savant
 
Mars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brampton, Ontario
Posts: 108
Default

40% over a single fan setup? I doubt that. And yeah, I agree. Way too much noise and double the cost.
__________________
The Rage is Relentless
Mars is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-03-2004, 09:29 PM   #7
Anemone
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston MA area
Posts: 48
Default

Well it wasn't for cooling's sake persay, but rather that DUE to cooling I'm vaguely trying to see if I can balance the airflow before I cut more holes

Thanks for everyone's input though!
Anemone is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 08:31 AM   #8
Butcher
Thermophile
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,064
Default

Even were there no restriction you wouldn't get double CFM with push/pull - 2 fans in series are not going to give double airflow.
__________________
Once upon a time, in a land far far away...
Butcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 03:31 PM   #9
Razor6
Cooling Savant
 
Razor6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butcher
Even were there no restriction you wouldn't get double CFM with push/pull - 2 fans in series are not going to give double airflow.
With no restriction and no interference they should get double the static pressure.
Razor6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 03:34 PM   #10
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

Razor6
got data ?
did you look at pH's test results ?
and . . . .
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 04:09 PM   #11
myv65
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 365
Default

With no restriction and no interference (what's the difference between "restriction" and "interference"?) you will essentially not have any static pressure.

To the original question, this is little different than two centrifugal pumps in series. Much like that, most people who answer have no clue about which they speak. I will give you the "general answer" without specifics as specifics depend on the actual fans, resistance, etc.

When you add a second fan or pump in series the flow rate will go up. Each fan or pump still follows its characteristic curve, however. Each device is passing more flow, but more flow equates to higher losses. Those higher losses are divided across two devices. You need to find the new point on the characteristic curve where the new losses / 2 meets the curve. You can easily determine absolute bounds for this. With no resistance, flow would truly double (not truly possible). With zero flow, static pressure would truly double (no benefit as without flow there is no cooling). In the "real world", I'd hazard that adding a second identical fan would probably bump net air flow to the tune of ~1/4 to 1/3. This is probably (as shown by Phaetus' data) nearly indiscernable to the CPU.
myv65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 04:22 PM   #12
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

I ran these tests too several years ago with my home-built wind tunnel (thermal anemometer and digital differential manometer) and never saw even 10% increase in flow, none in dissipation (given the substantial 'error' in such measurements)
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 04:31 PM   #13
jaydee
Put up or Shut Up
 
jaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
Default

I have done a lot of half assed testing on this and have come up with similar results. Louder and the water temp not much cooler. To be honest I don't get much better results using a shroud either but the shroud gave better numbers than adding a second fan.

Of course this is with just cheap DMM's and not great ambient temp control.
jaydee is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 04:31 PM   #14
Les
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wigan UK
Posts: 929
Default

myv65 is migrant visitor these days.
His words are well chosen and the science is correct
Suggest that, those who have not, read his article
Les is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 05:18 PM   #15
myv65
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 365
Default

Thanks Les. I'm not sure the "AMDMB" links to the articles always work anymore. If not, users are advised to visit the "new" site Ryan is running at www.pcper.com
myv65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 05:59 PM   #16
Anemone
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston MA area
Posts: 48
Default

Well thank you all - seems the definite core advice is "don't use push pull designs they're idiotic" is without doubt.

Back to the design board
Anemone is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 06:04 PM   #17
Butcher
Thermophile
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor6
With no restriction and no interference they should get double the static pressure.
CFM/airflow and static pressure are two entirely different quantities.
__________________
Once upon a time, in a land far far away...
Butcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-04-2004, 06:41 PM   #18
pHaestus
Big Player
Making Big Money
 
pHaestus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com
Posts: 4,782
Default

Hi Dave
Long time no see!
__________________
Getting paid like a biker with the best crank...
-MF DOOM
pHaestus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-05-2004, 12:06 AM   #19
Razor6
Cooling Savant
 
Razor6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butcher
CFM/airflow and static pressure are two entirely different quantities.
I didn't say they were the same, I was talking about max pressure when you have no flow. :shrug:

Also when I said no restriction and no interference I was speaking hypothetically. As in, if you could attach two fans in series while not incurring additional restrictions to air flow and could prevent the first fan's turbulence from affecting the second fan.
Razor6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-05-2004, 01:16 PM   #20
Razor6
Cooling Savant
 
Razor6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 192
Default

Speaking of fans in series Cooler Master has this new dual fan unit the Dual Storm. The first fan looks like a turbine blade and the second fan spins in the oposite direction and has more traditional blades but swept back.

Dual Storm (slow)

Does it really work as advertised? Who knows, but it does look like an interesting design.
Razor6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-05-2004, 01:25 PM   #21
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

I'd have more faith in Delta GUB0812VHG
6 blades on top, 3 below counter-rotating
no specs that I can find, not too noisy

I'll put on a MCW80 and test
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2004, 09:34 AM   #22
HammerSandwich
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 15143
Posts: 358
Default

Sounds like the Delta GFBs.
__________________
www.procooling.com: It's true we are often a bunch of assholes
HammerSandwich is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2004, 09:42 AM   #23
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

Thanks for the link HS, I was stumped

procooling is a resource
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2004, 09:53 AM   #24
Tempus
Cooling Savant
 
Tempus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 456
Default

nice looking fans (took a peak at the 120mm in the spec sheet.)

I'd love to see a review on them.
__________________
Thou art God.
Tempus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-06-2004, 10:04 AM   #25
BillA
CoolingWorks Tech Guy
Formerly "Unregistered"
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Posts: 2,371.493,106
Posts: 4,440
Default

the noise on those 120s ?
aiiii
I have an 80mm VHE @ 47.5dBA, no whine - just air turbulence
BillA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...