Go Back   Pro/Forums > ProCooling Technical Discussions > General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat

General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums.

View Poll Results: Which AMD CPU Block
TDX 9 9.47%
RBX 4 4.21%
Maze4 4 4.21%
MCW6000 59 62.11%
MCW5000 0 0%
PolarFlo TT 1 1.05%
WhiteWater 23 24.21%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 09-13-2004, 08:53 PM   #26
Cathar
Thermophile
 
Cathar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DryFire
I always thought the 6000 was best price/preformance for what I was going to set up. (csp-750 (when i can get one) -> fedco 2342 -> 6002 -> csp-750, possible gpu block later)

But i think the whitewater would do better with a mag3 if you want to spend the extra $20.
Fairly easy to hit the 7-9LPM mark with the White Water and one of a number of reasonably priced pumps in a 1/2" setup and a heater-core style radiator. Fairly easy to even keep it in the 6-8LPM range with a GPU block added as well.
Cathar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-13-2004, 10:09 PM   #27
JWFokker
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 269
Default

The WhiteWater is only $10 more than the MCW6000 for an Athlon XP block, but will you notice any difference? Most likely, no. And with the emphasis put on affordable, my vote goes to the MCW6000 (which is also why I bought one). The TDX and RBX are so close they're effectively the same as the Swiftech in my book. Depending upon which site you go to, the Swiftech and Dangerden blocks swich positions (I do have more faith in Procooling's tests though). But you won't see 1C difference one way or the other until you get up over 100W of heat from your CPU. Your rad and fan decisions will make more of an impact on temps than TDX vs MCW6000. Best bang for the buck goes to the MCW6000.
JWFokker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-01-2004, 10:00 PM   #28
ferdb
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: texas
Posts: 68
Default

I have both a TDX and the MCW6000. The MCW6000 works a little better in my overclocked AMD64 system with a CPS750 pump than the TDX, but they're both very close. If you have a higher flow pump the TDX may be just as good. I like the 6000 because it's very good even at quite low flow rates and it's cheaper. Because the 6000 is not so flow rate sensitive I don't think it's going to make a noticeable difference whether you plumb with 3/8" or 1/2" ID hose, and the 3/8" is much easier to work with. Just out of curiosity I stuck an extra 7 foot section of 3/8" tubing in my system ( CSP750 pump, MCW6000, BI Pro II radiator), the back pressure went from 31" of water up to only 35", which if my pump is following the pressure/flow rate curves reduces the system from 80GPH to 70GPH. The 3/8" hose just doesn't contribute that much back pressure, going to 1/2" isn't going to buy you much, especially considering that MCW6000 thermal resistance only improves something like 4% if you double the flow rate from 60GPH to 120GPH.
The TDX performance deteriorates at lower flow rates. Get the MCW6000 and you get about the best performance you can get, plus you don't have to worry about using large hose and high power pumps if you don't want to.
ferdb is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-07-2005, 06:38 AM   #29
dacooltech
Pro/Vendor
 
dacooltech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JWFokker
The WhiteWater is only $10 more than the MCW6000 for an Athlon XP block...
not anymore heheh may i suggest doing a price search
__________________
www.cooltechnica.com
dacooltech is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-07-2005, 08:42 PM   #30
JWFokker
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 269
Default

Holy thread resurrection Batman!

Also, I wouldn't want a block with an aluminum or poly top in my system, but that's just me.
JWFokker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-08-2005, 03:18 AM   #31
dacooltech
Pro/Vendor
 
dacooltech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JWFokker
Holy thread resurrection Batman!

Also, I wouldn't want a block with an aluminum or poly top in my system, but that's just me.
I agree with you on the most part.

But let me clarify or highlight one thing with the AL topped WW.
AL topped WW is the only block - that I know of - where there's minimal contact with AL top and H2O.
Meaning, thanks to the Copper Mid Plate, since it covers the entire surface of the AL top, except the inlet and outlet holes, water is barely in contact with AL. and don't forget, the fittings are inserted in to those threaded holes, so exposure of aluminum (that's anodized ofcourse) to H2O is extremely minimal.

BTW I'm running an AL topped WW and a MCW50 GPU block in one of my systems for the last 2 yrs without any problems. Using distilled H2O w/ 15% Zerex RSC mixture as the coolant ofcourse.

As for the poly tops, I agree with you on the tapped poly tops. When a tapped poly top is used, one should avoid putting metal barbed fittings on it and wouldn't let heavy 1/2"ID x 3/4"OD x 1/8"WALL tubing hangin' from the barbs, unsupported.
Quick-Connects and 3/8"ID x 1/2"OD tubing are the best for tapped poly tops IMHO.
__________________
www.cooltechnica.com

Last edited by dacooltech; 01-08-2005 at 03:27 AM.
dacooltech is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-08-2005, 02:26 PM   #32
JWFokker
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 269
Default

Any chance there'll be a copper topped WW available ever?
JWFokker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-09-2005, 12:04 PM   #33
pHaestus
Big Player
Making Big Money
 
pHaestus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com
Posts: 4,782
Default

Little River waterblocks used to sell one I believe
pHaestus is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-09-2005, 01:09 PM   #34
BalefireX
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 269
Default

Doesnt someone still sell aftermarket copper tops for WW blocks?

EDIT: After searching (and then searching the internet archive) I have discovered the supplier was www.logiccooling.com (now defunct)

Archived site here:
http://web.archive.org/web/200312060...ategory_Code=W

Dont know if anyone else is making these now or if this guy is still in business despite his site being down, but I knew it did exist!
__________________
If not, why not?

Last edited by BalefireX; 01-09-2005 at 01:15 PM.
BalefireX is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-09-2005, 04:48 PM   #35
JWFokker
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kingston, NY
Posts: 269
Default

They're gone. They went on vacation I think, and never came back. They wanted too much for it anyway.
JWFokker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-11-2005, 01:48 AM   #36
YaYappyDoa
Cooling Neophyte
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 2
Default

I think "best bang for bucks" is the diy R-Type. Simple to do (requires only a drill) and effective.
Ok it isn't a commercial block but worth consideration!!
YaYappyDoa is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-11-2005, 12:44 PM   #37
snowwie
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 154
Default

the copper top for the white water was made by neomoses i think for a little while, but then he said he sold (or gave?) logiccooling to a friend...haven't heard much from him in a while

but then again i almost never go on overclockers anymore

if i had a powerful pump i'd get a TDX, otherwise, i'd get a mcw6000
snowwie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-12-2005, 03:30 PM   #38
sickness
Cooling Neophyte
 
sickness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 5
Default

I'd probably go with the mcw6000 w/ 3/8" tubing & the mcp350 pump instead of the mcw6002 w/ 1/2" tubing & the mcp650 pump. Although, would the mcp350 pump work well with the double heatercore @ dangerden? I've heard it restricts lots of flow.
__________________
Athlon XP-M 2600+ @ 2520 mhz (210x12)
Thermalright SP-97 w/ 92mm Tornado (watercooling coming soon)
DFI LanParty NFII Ultra B
1GB OCZ PC-3500 Platinum LE @ CL 2-2-2-11
HIS IceQ Excalibur 9800 Pro 128mb @ 430/382
Hitachi 160GB 7200RPM SATA HD
Aspire Silver X-Dreamer (modded for better airflow)
Antec 480 True Blue PSU
sickness is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-12-2005, 05:15 PM   #39
snowwie
Cooling Savant
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 154
Default

the dd double heatcore? i don't think it's any more restrictive than any black ice or thermochill product.

you can check billa's data on thermal-management-testing.com in rad testing, i'm sure he measures a double heatercore's pressure drop compared to other units
snowwie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-12-2005, 07:32 PM   #40
Cathar
Thermophile
 
Cathar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
Default

Posted in the wrong thead - oops.
Cathar is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-18-2005, 01:39 AM   #41
chernobyl
Cooling Neophyte
 
chernobyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 7
Default

As I havent seen the Asetek Antarctica block mentioned here...
I'm using the 1/2" version with an Eheim 1048 pump and Ford Sierra Heatercore. Its excellent.
The block is highly rated, I did expect to see a mention of it here.

I get 18C above ambient at full load with an Athlon XP 2500+ clocked to 2.7GHz @ 2.0V
From calculation I'm generating around 135W of heat.
Max error on the temp is +/- 2C, so I have a worst case C/W of 20/135 = 0.148 for the whole system!

temps measured with external sensor.
chernobyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-18-2005, 06:19 AM   #42
Butcher
Thermophile
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,064
Default

Got an MCW6002 for my new A64 yesterday, it's really nice. Kudos to Bill and the lads at Swiftech for nice engineering job.
__________________
Once upon a time, in a land far far away...
Butcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-06-2005, 01:01 PM   #43
Blackeagle
Thermophile
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: U.S.A = Michigan
Posts: 1,243
Default

I voted for the TDX, but I have a #4 jet in mine & the brass top. My reasons for this choice:

NO corrosion risk with the brass top, aluminum isn't a good material for in a water loop. It just saves the blocks maker money.

And the TDX with the #4 jet offers better performance than with the stock jet. Should really come already installed IMO.

TDX with 2 barbs is a easier install than the WW or RBX blocks.
Blackeagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(C) 2005 ProCooling.com
If we in some way offend you, insult you or your people, screw your mom, beat up your dad, or poop on your porch... we're sorry... we were probably really drunk...
Oh and dont steal our content bitches! Don't give us a reason to pee in your open car window this summer...