wb performance graphing

[dream caster]

Originally posted by unregistered
g.l.amour
people 'approach' WCing from different perspectives,
myv65's is engineering which will quickly discern a 'point of diminishing returns'

mine is as an 'experimentalist' (so I have been told), so my interest is in deriving and examining data
from which I deduce some things, and predict others;
but 'need' theory only to rationally understand relationships that may be too complex to directly test

dream caster
this more useful ?

. . .

I'll re-do it for mH2O now, and work on the 462-UH's C/W #s tomorrow

. . .

better ?

Yup, those two graphs are what we need.

[Cathar]

Originally posted by bigben2k
You mean Bass-Injected? What a nut!

No, not Bass-Injected.

He lives about 900km from me.

Hard for him to drop around and pick up.

Sorry for thread hijacking, I'll stop now.

[#Rotor]

Bill-A all the blocks you test with are Channel-blocks, Right?


I mean they all have a prescribed path the fluid needs to take, to get through.. or do you have some Pin-Grid-array designs in there too...

[BillA]

I tested Hoot's, which is a hybrid (and excellent performer !)
and the Swiftech's certainly are not labyrinths
the ones used as testing examples for this article are all commercial - intentionally so

(and you might recall that many months ago I suggested you send a wb to JoeC)

there are many ways to skin a cat, all depends on the choices and goals
(relative ranking of design variables)

Cathar
don't sweat it, threads evolve
(and mH²O seem to have swept the field)

BTW, the reason inches are used is that you can't see a mm from the moon
(yea, I remember; we also 'lost' a satellite due to such)