![]() | ||
|
|
General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums. |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: state of denial
Posts: 488
|
![]()
I just came from overclockers shootout.
they made a water block with a peltier built in ![]() Is this better than sandwiching the pelt? think we'll see any of these being sold? I can see how it would limit condensation by the fact that there is less cold surface area exposed to the air.
__________________
2.4Ghz Compaq Workstation 2.8Ghz Custom 2700+ Custom still running 2000!!!! Help with Coding www.resago.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Slacking more than your weird uncle
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: San Diego, CA (UCSD) / Los Angeles, CA (home)
Posts: 1,605
|
![]()
This is pretty effective as the water is touching the pelt itself, not a piece of copper touching the pelt. The only problem is that the water is often not efficiently routed over the peltier. In other words, the dangerden block has passages in it. To get the best results, you'd have to take that block, sand off the bottom, and glue it to a peltier. Then seal w/ epoxy. That could be pretty sweet!
-Kev
__________________
I used to throw hot coffee all over the ass of the horse there, then whip him while he was kickin' at me. Those f***in things are crazy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Eindhoven, Holland
Posts: 238
|
![]()
hmm.. i once thought about that idea..
but i came back from it... surface area and is the keyword.. also u need to clamp the pelt with some force... better get a block interface between than no surface area.. but if u really want to... UTFS! http://forums.procooling.com/ubbcgi/...c&f=2&t=000068
__________________
OC'ing is my middlename |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|