![]() | ||
|
|
General Liquid/Water Cooling Discussion For discussion about Full Cooling System kits, or general cooling topics. Keep specific cooling items like pumps, radiators, etc... in their specific forums. |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: blah
Posts: 35
|
![]()
Been waiting on this for a while , down to the purchasing time , cant decide, not much in price difference, and from the reviews sometimes the RBX comes out on top and sometimes the WW, read some post where cathar says WW takes off at higher flow.
But also seen some say the same for RBX. Now my system is 1048 chevette heater core and a dangerden gf4/radeon 9700 gpu block, Does anyone know what the average flow is for that setup and which block would be best, Im only posting because i myself cannot decide and i need more input then what i am finding on the net. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]()
The 1048 isn't going to cut it for either block. If your set on that pump get a high flow rate block like the DD Maze 4 or D-Tek TC-4.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: blah
Posts: 35
|
![]()
Not set on the pump just no money for a new one, the reviews ive seen, among other thigns have used this pump and C/W wasnt bad at all would it be temporarly decent?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Pro/Guru - Uber Mod
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 834
|
![]()
My system consists of a White Water, an MCW50, a large (somewhat more restrictive than typical) heatercore, four 3/4" ball valves, about 10 feet of 1/2" ID tubing and about 10 feet of 5/8" ID tubing.
According to my mobo's temp sensor, my temp dropped ~1C when going from a 1048 to an Iwaki MD20-R. I'd say the 1048 will do just fine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]() Quote:
Read http://www.overclockers.com/articles886/ one of the few that can take a decent C/W value. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: blah
Posts: 35
|
![]()
im looking more toward the future im probaly going to get a bigger pump , im was reviewing to reading some of cathars post on the overclockers forums where he listed he was talking about the 1048
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,014
|
![]()
If you want a good low flow block, the new swifty mcx5002 (I think its called) would be good.
If upgrading to a new pump, go ahead and get a mag 3, 350gph, 10.5ft head pressure, and relatively cheap and very reliable.
__________________
I have a nice computer. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 285
|
![]() Quote:
However as soon as you add extra blocks you are pushing the limit. The 1048 will do fine for now, but expect it to be a few degrees below top performance. I've go the WW, simply because I think the RBX design is flawed. It is just trying to sell blocks on idea that adding two together gives better performance. It doesn't necessarily work. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: singapore
Posts: 39
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by bozo; 12-06-2003 at 04:32 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]() Quote:
Anyway just do it. Should work ok. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 15
|
![]()
It will be fine. If you get an RBX, you can adjust it for more flow anyway, though I doubt anything would be gained by it. All of these watercoolers are all about throwing money at things. I'd bet that either of those blocks would outperform the "low flow" blocks in your current configuration and rock balls if you upgraded the pump.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Big PlayerMaking Big Money
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com
Posts: 4,782
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Getting paid like a biker with the best crank... -MF DOOM |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 285
|
![]() Quote:
I have some other issues with the block though: It doesn't appear to cover the AMD mounting pads, whoich means a higher chance of crushing your core, especially just from slightly movement and hose tugging down on one side. The nozzle system. I mean 6 nozzles? Why not just supply the best one instead of making people screw around. From the reviews I have seen it was only one nozzle that provided WW level cooling, and this nozzle wasn't supplied as standard, only in the 6 nozzle kit. It may be a really good block, but I'm not so sure. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Big PlayerMaking Big Money
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com
Posts: 4,782
|
![]()
It's really not that similar to a cascade at all. If you look at what makes the cascade WORK then it's completely different.
__________________
Getting paid like a biker with the best crank... -MF DOOM |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Cooling Savant
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 221
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Big PlayerMaking Big Money
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: irc.lostgeek.com #procooling.com
Posts: 4,782
|
![]()
they have one that is like many straws sticking down into cups? i assumed it was merely holes...
__________________
Getting paid like a biker with the best crank... -MF DOOM |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]()
It is nothing like the RBX in any way. The cups in the RBX only purpose is to create extra surface area, they are not used for jet impingement. It is nothing more than a White Water with wavy fins, some shallow cups, wider and less channels, and some changeable jets.
Also DD is shipping extra pads to use in place of the AMD pads that it doesn't touch, also the RBX does not cover the entire surface of a IHS. I thought we covered this already. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: U.S.A = Michigan
Posts: 1,243
|
![]() Quote:
Yep! ! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,014
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
I have a nice computer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Cooling Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 13
|
![]() Quote:
As long as its got something like 4LPH going through it, it should be ok.... People and 1048 bashing ![]()
__________________
OCAU Extreme Cooling Club H2O Member 2100+ T-bred 'B' @ 2550MHz / 2.0V LR Cascade / Eheim 1048 / Cathar 'Little Arse' Rad/Swiftech MCW-50 GPU PCDB Delta Goodrem is hot - http://dualxp.net/images/delta/ irc.oz.org #flora - full of erm... stuff :P |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Put up or Shut Up
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 6,506
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Thermophile
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,538
|
![]() Quote:
The RBX looks to me like its channels are cut with a 1/16" cutter (~1.59mm). This allows for dramatically faster machining (~2.5x) than the White Water with its 1.0mm channels/cutter. Due to the obvious loss in fin/channel density, the only way to claw back some lost performance is by introducing some turbulence mechanisms, such as wavy fin walls and a few dips (voids) here and there, which are fairly "low cost" to machine in terms of time needed. So basically the RBX looks like it'd probably take about half the machine time of the White Water to carve it out. From a machine-time/performance/cost perspective, this then makes good sense as to why it's made the way it is. The RBX would need about half the time on a milling machine as the White Water does. However, the straight-forward nature of the White Water means that it doesn't necessarily need to be made on a milling machine. Basically it's all about making the best trade-off between machine time/effort/cost by attempting to cheaply make up for some of what was lost. From that approach, it is a fairly unique adaptation of the White Water design. It is absolutely and positively nothing like a Cascade though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|